Hardware Component Validation via Inventory Certificates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Information Handling Systems (IHSs) face security vulnerabilities due to the potential replacement of factory-installed hardware components, which can compromise their integrity and functionality, especially in mass-produced devices like mobile phones and tablets.

Innovation Solution

A method for validating the secure assembly of IHSs by retrieving and comparing an inventory certificate uploaded during factory provisioning, which includes a list of factory-installed hardware components and validation schemas, to ensure that detected components match those installed during factory assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hardware components are replaced to customize or repair IHS, then functionality or reliability may be improved, but security integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by establishing a baseline hardware inventory and generating cryptographic hashes during factory provisioning. These pre-computed reference values are stored securely in the system before any potential hardware replacement occurs, enabling future validation to detect unauthorized changes while allowing legitimate repairs or upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through continuous validation processes that compare current hardware inventory against the stored baseline. The system provides feedback when hardware changes are detected, triggering validation workflows that verify whether replacements are authorized, thus enabling security monitoring while allowing legitimate hardware updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If validation schemas and inventory certificates are implemented, then hardware authenticity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware authenticityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating a digital copy of the hardware inventory state during factory provisioning. This baseline inventory is stored as reference data and compared against future hardware states, eliminating the need for complex continuous verification mechanisms while maintaining authentication capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by transforming hardware identification into cryptographic hash values and digital certificates. These parameter transformations enable reliable hardware authentication through standardized data formats and comparison operations, simplifying the validation process despite the underlying complexity of secure identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If factory provisioning includes inventory certificates with validation schemas, then security validation capability is improved, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity validation capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing hardware inventory capture and validation schema generation during the factory provisioning phase. These preparatory actions create the reference data needed for future security validations, consolidating complexity into the manufacturing process rather than requiring ongoing validation infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces validation schemas as intermediary data structures that bridge the gap between hardware identification and security validation. These schemas serve as standardized intermediaries that translate physical hardware characteristics into verifiable digital representations, simplifying the validation process while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11423180B2Secure identification of components installed in information handling systems
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 DELL PROD LP
  • US11423180B2 patent drawing
  • US11423180B2 patent drawing
  • US11423180B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and system are provided for validating the secure assembly and delivery of an IHS (Information Handling System). During factory provisioning of the IHS, an inventory certificate is uploaded to the IHS, where the certificate includes an inventory of the hardware components installed during factory assembly of the IHS and also includes validation schemas the provide instructions for identifying hardware components of the IHS. Upon delivery of the assembled IHS, a validation process is initialized and the inventory certificate is retrieved. Based on the instructions set forth by the validation schemas, the validation process collects an inventory of the detected hardware components of the IHS. The instructions of the validation schemas are further used to compare the collected inventory against the inventory from the signed inventory certificate in order to validate the detected hardware components of the IHS as the same hardware components installed during factory assembly of the IHS.