Hardware Configuration Recommendation System Based on User Satisfaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current recommender systems for computing devices typically suggest purchasing new devices rather than fine-tuning existing hardware configurations, failing to differentiate sellers and not addressing user-specific performance issues effectively.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven method that collects user activity data, generates user profiles, clusters users based on their profiles, calculates satisfaction scores, and recommends hardware upgrades to less satisfied users within a cluster using the configurations of more satisfied users, thereby providing personalized and cost-effective upgrade suggestions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a recommender system suggests purchasing entirely new computing devices, then users can get new functionality, but users cannot fine-tune existing hardware configurations and sellers cannot differentiate from competitors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware configuration adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into distinct clusters based on their computing device usage patterns, hardware configurations, and satisfaction levels. By dividing the user base into segments (e.g., power users, casual users, satisfied users, dissatisfied users), the system can provide tailored recommendations for each segment rather than generic suggestions, enabling fine-tuning of existing hardware for specific user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing customized hardware upgrade recommendations specific to each user cluster's characteristics and satisfaction levels. Instead of uniform recommendations, the system adjusts the nature and type of hardware suggestions based on local user needs, usage patterns, and pain points identified through clustering analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If a recommender system provides generic upgrade suggestions, then implementation is simple, but user satisfaction cannot be optimized for specific performance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfaction measurementVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring user interactions with computing devices, collecting usage data, and measuring satisfaction levels. This feedback loop allows the system to identify dissatisfied users, understand their specific performance issues, and provide targeted hardware upgrade recommendations that directly address measured pain points, thereby optimizing user satisfaction through data-driven insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If sellers recommend entirely new devices, then revenue potential is maximized, but cost-effectiveness for users is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation effectivenessVSAvoiduser investment loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by recommending selective hardware upgrades rather than complete device replacements. The system identifies specific hardware components that need upgrading based on user cluster analysis and satisfaction metrics, suggesting only the necessary partial upgrades needed to resolve performance issues. This approach maintains productivity by addressing specific bottlenecks while avoiding the excessive investment of purchasing entirely new devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11455676B2Data-driven hardware configuration recommendation system based on user satisfaction rating
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11455676B2 patent drawing
  • US11455676B2 patent drawing
  • US11455676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for recommending hardware configuration changes using a user satisfaction rating. One method comprises obtaining usage data indicating user activity for users on computing devices; generating a user profile for each user; clustering the users into user clusters based on the user profiles; determining, for a given user cluster, a satisfaction score for each user in the given user cluster based on the obtained usage data for each user on the computing device; providing suggested hardware upgrades for the computing device of a given user in the given user cluster, wherein the given user is selected based on a lower corresponding satisfaction score relative to the satisfaction scores of other users in the given cluster, and wherein the one or more suggested hardware upgrades are based on hardware configurations of other users in the given cluster having a higher corresponding satisfaction score.