Hardware Failure Detection with Multimodal Fusion for Weak Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rule-based hardware failure detection methods are insufficient and inaccurate, failing to cover all hardware issues and requiring manual handling, as they rely on strong signals related to serious failures and ignore weak signals.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based hardware failure detection model that utilizes multimodal feature fusion, combining hardware event logs and performance signals to detect failed components, employing pattern-level embedding for logs and frequency domain analysis for signals, with a training dataset refined through heuristic iterative procedures and low confidence ticket filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If rule-based detection methods are used, then the detection process is simple to implement, but the detection accuracy and coverage are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rule-based detection mechanisms with a machine learning model that processes hardware event logs and performance signals. The model uses pattern-level embedding for logs and frequency domain analysis for signals, substituting manual rule configuration with automated learning-based detection that achieves superior accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If only strong signals are considered, then the detection method is easier to implement, but weak signals related to subtle hardware issues are ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method complexityVSAvoiddetection coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic signal processing by transforming performance signals from time domain to frequency domain using Fast Fourier Transform. This dynamic transformation enables the detection system to capture both strong and weak signals across different frequency spectrums, allowing subtle hardware issues to be detected without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a frequency domain dimension to the detection process by performing FFT on performance signals. This dimensional transformation allows the system to analyze signals from multiple perspectives (time and frequency domains simultaneously), improving detection coverage for both strong and weak signals while maintaining manageable complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If manual handling is required for undetected hardware issues, then the detection system can be simpler, but the overall system efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automated root cause inference that directly identifies failed hardware components based on detected patterns and signal analysis. The system automatically generates diagnostic conclusions without requiring manual intervention, enabling the detection system to handle all hardware issues autonomously and maintain high system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If multimodal feature fusion is implemented, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multimodal feature fusion process into distinct processing streams: one for hardware event logs using pattern-level embedding and another for performance signals using frequency domain analysis. Each stream is processed independently through specialized modules, then their features are fused at the decision level. This segmentation reduces computational complexity by avoiding redundant processing while maintaining high prediction accuracy through complementary feature integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250252004A1Performing hardware failure detection based on multimodal feature fusion
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20250252004A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252004A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252004A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure proposes a method, apparatus and computer program product for performing hardware failure detection based on multimodal feature fusion. A set of hardware event logs of a machine may be obtained, the machine including multiple hardware components. A set of performance signals of the machine may be obtained, the set of performance signals being time-series data. At least one failed hardware component in the machine may be detected based on the set of hardware event logs and the set of performance signals.