Automated Hardware Component Inventory for Control Unit Test Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control unit test systems are prone to errors due to manual configuration of hardware components, which can lead to incorrect selection of components for simulating environmental conditions, resulting in unreliable test results and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for uniquely identifying hardware components connected to the test system, allowing for the creation of an inventory and configuration checks to ensure correct component pairing and reduce human error, by reading and storing digital identifying information from simulation-specific components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual configuration of hardware components is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to human error in component selection and pairing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of configurationVSAvoidtest system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The test system automatically performs inventory of hardware components and verifies configurations without human intervention. The system reads component information autonomously, compares it against required configurations, and identifies mismatches, thereby eliminating reliance on manual operator accuracy while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where component information is read, stored, and compared against required configurations. The comparison results provide feedback on configuration correctness, enabling automatic detection and correction of errors, thus improving reliability without complicating operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated identification of hardware components is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional identification and inventory systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal identification methods that can read component information from various hardware components through a standardized interface. The inventory system and verification process serve multiple functions including component tracking, configuration validation, and error detection, thereby reducing the need for separate specialized systems and minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive inventory of all hardware components is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to extended configuration verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent identification accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs inventory and configuration verification as a preliminary action before actual testing begins. By completing the identification and validation process in advance, the system ensures high measurement precision for component tracking while preventing time loss during critical test execution phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9633144B2Method for performing an inventory of the hardware components connected to a control unit test system
Publication Date: 2017.04.25 DSPACE SE & CO KG
  • US9633144B2 patent drawing
  • US9633144B2 patent drawing
  • US9633144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for performing an inventory of the hardware components connected to a control unit test system, wherein control units can be tested with the test system in an environment simulated by the test system by means of a model, and wherein the test system comprises at least one computer) and hardware components that are connected to one another by means of at least one network. For at least a portion of the hardware components, in particular of all simulation-specific hardware components, at least one item of component information that uniquely and digitally identifies the hardware component is read therefrom, and all identifying component information that has been read out is stored.