Hardware Prediction System for Cloud Resource Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developers face challenges in determining the optimal cloud provider and hardware configuration for running device applications due to the complexity and cost of experimenting with various cloud resources, with no easy way to find the best provider and setup for their needs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that uses machine learning algorithms to predict the necessary hardware and resource requirements for a device application by analyzing historical data, selecting suitable components, and generating a machine-readable specification to determine compatible hardware and providers, optimizing resource allocation and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If developers experiment with various hardware configurations and cloud providers to find the ideal setup, then they can identify the best performance and cost combination, but the process becomes time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware selection accuracyVSAvoidhardware provisioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by analyzing historical data from multiple cloud providers to pre-determine optimal hardware configurations before the developer needs to provision resources. This eliminates the need for time-consuming experimentation by providing ready-made recommendations based on proven performance patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary hardware recommendation service that sits between the developer and multiple cloud providers. This intermediary analyzes requirements, compares configurations across providers, and presents optimized options, eliminating the need for developers to directly experiment with numerous hardware setups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If developers manually optimize all cloud resources including storage, memory, nodes, and CPUs, then they can achieve optimal resource allocation, but the process becomes daunting and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource optimization efficiencyVSAvoidresource configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing resource requirements and generating optimized hardware configurations without requiring developer expertise in cloud resource optimization. The system handles the complexity of coordinating storage, memory, nodes, and CPUs automatically based on application needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides a universal hardware recommendation service that handles multiple types of cloud resources (storage, memory, compute nodes, CPUs) through a single integrated interface. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate optimization processes for each resource type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If developers select from multiple cloud providers with different hardware resources and pricing, then they can find the best price-performance ratio, but determining the optimal provider becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecloud provider selection flexibilityVSAvoidprovider selection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary recommendation service that compares multiple cloud providers and their hardware offerings. This intermediary translates the complexity of comparing different providers' pricing and performance characteristics into simplified, optimized recommendations that maintain provider selection flexibility while eliminating comparison difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the approach from manually comparing static provider parameters to dynamically analyzing historical performance data and pricing patterns. By transforming the selection process from parameter-by-parameter comparison to pattern-based recommendation, the system maintains flexibility while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240320520A1Systems and methods for predicting hardware for an undeveloped device application
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 ENGINEER AI CORP
  • US20240320520A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320520A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320520A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and. computer readable storage mediums for determining a hardware system to run an undeveloped device application are disclosed. The method includes determining one or more hardware components that are capable of performing a selection of features for an undeveloped device application and determining one or more providers that offer the one or more hardware components. The method further includes generating a package for each of the one or more providers, the package including the one or more hardware components, and generating a provider configuration capable of running the undeveloped device application on the one or more hardware components.