Hardware and Software Compliance Verification with Cryptographic Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of consensus on how to ensure that hardware and software products comply with the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) cybersecurity requirements, which are essential for protecting against vulnerabilities and attacks, and existing security measures are inadequate for maintaining robust cybersecurity.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based system is used to determine the compliance of hardware and software components with cybersecurity requirements by accessing cryptographically bound containers that store information about compliance, allowing verification of digital entities and ensuring they meet both product-agnostic and product-specific requirements, and dynamically monitoring interactions to maintain security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If products implement comprehensive cybersecurity measures to comply with CRA requirements, then security and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity complianceVSAvoidcompliance verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A processor-based compliance verification system acts as an intermediary between hardware/software components and cybersecurity requirements. The system automatically determines compliance by accessing containers with compliance information, eliminating the need for complex manual verification processes while ensuring CRA compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance verification system enables products to self-verify their compliance status by accessing their own compliance information stored in containers. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for external verification complexity while maintaining comprehensive security measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If dynamic monitoring of interactions is implemented to maintain security, then reliability is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity maintenanceVSAvoidmonitoring system energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs compliance verification and security monitoring at specific intervals rather than continuously. This periodic action maintains security reliability while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring, as the processor only activates when compliance checks or security events occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250217486A1Devices and methods for compliance of cybersecurity requirements of hardware and software components
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 INTEL CORP
  • US20250217486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217486A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217486A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus may include a processor, the processor configured to: access a container cryptographically bound to a component of a digital entity, wherein the container comprises information representative of a compliance of the digital entity to cybersecurity requirements, wherein the component of the digital entity comprises a hardware component or a software component; determine, based on the information, a result representing whether the digital entity is compliant with the cybersecurity requirements; determine, based on the result, a verification state of the digital entity.