In-Field Hardware Telemetry Capture for FPGA Testing Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hardware testing methods for integrated circuits (ICs) are inefficient and costly due to the complexity of modern FPGA designs, making exhaustive simulation and manual analysis of large data sets impractical, and there is a lack of architectural mechanisms for capturing and interpreting in-field telemetry data from deployed ICs without extensive manual efforts.

Innovation Solution

A framework is provided for configuring ICs to output a telemetry bit stream, using a software device driver to interpret and capture hardware telemetry data, which is then stored and aggregated across multiple devices for statistical analysis, allowing for wide-scale, in-field testing and hardware logic upgrades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If exhaustive simulation and manual analysis are used for hardware testing, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and productivity deteriorate significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware testing accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual analysis methods with automated software drivers that capture and interpret telemetry data from hardware components. This substitution of mechanical/manual processes with automated computational systems resolves the contradiction by maintaining testing accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The hardware component is equipped with self-monitoring capabilities through embedded telemetry generators that automatically collect and output performance data. This self-service approach allows the hardware to provide its own testing data without requiring external manual intervention, thus improving efficiency while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If exhaustive simulation is performed for hardware testing, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware design verificationVSAvoidtesting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces exhaustive simulation processes with automated in-field telemetry collection using software drivers. This substitution maintains design verification quality by capturing actual hardware performance data while significantly increasing testing throughput through parallel data collection from multiple deployed devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent shifts the testing dimension from pre-deployment laboratory simulation to post-deployment in-field observation. This dimensional change allows testing to occur in the actual operational environment, maintaining verification precision while enabling concurrent testing of numerous devices, thus improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If manual interpretation of telemetry data is performed, then measurement precision is maintained, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetelemetry data accuracyVSAvoiddata analysis effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual interpretation of telemetry data with automated software drivers that capture, parse, and aggregate hardware performance data. This automation maintains measurement precision through systematic data collection while dramatically improving ease of operation by eliminating burdensome manual analysis efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If in-field telemetry capture is implemented without architectural mechanisms, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to manual efforts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein-field testing capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal software driver architecture that can capture and interpret telemetry data from various hardware components through standardized interfaces. This universal approach enables in-field testing adaptability across different device types while reducing overall system complexity by providing a common framework rather than requiring custom manual procedures for each hardware type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4055482B1Telemetry generation for in-field hardware testing
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP4055482B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4055482B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4055482B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for capturing hardware telemetry includes a hardware component encoded with hardware logic for emitting a telemetry stream into memory of a computing device. The system further includes a hardware component driver stored in the memory that is configured to parse the telemetry stream, populate telemetry structures defined within a telemetry event schema based on values parsed from the telemetry stream, and generate a telemetry record including the populated telemetry structures.