Hardware Unique Key Minting for Blockchain Device Identity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current blockchain technologies are not effectively tied to specific hardware devices, making it difficult to verify and audit transactions associated with physical equipment, such as meters, in a secure and efficient manner.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates a unique key pair upon initialization of a physical computing device, allowing it to create a blockchain-based audit trail, which is used to securely track and meter the performance of physical equipment, enabling remote service providers to verify and record transactions through a digital certificate and blockchain ledger.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blockchain technology is used for digital wallets with public and private keys, then cryptographic security and transaction verification are improved, but the ability to tie blockchain records to specific hardware devices is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecryptographic securityVSAvoidhardware association information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the blockchain identification system into two parts: a hardware-unique key stored in secure element of the physical device, and a corresponding public key/address recorded on the blockchain. This segmentation allows the private key to remain securely tied to hardware while the public key enables blockchain interaction, resolving the contradiction between security and hardware association.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hardware-unique key as an intermediary that bridges physical hardware and blockchain. This unique key acts as a mediator that is both physically bound to the device and cryptographically linked to the blockchain address, enabling hardware identification on blockchain without exposing private keys.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If digital wallets are made decentralized and not tied to specific hardware, then ease of operation and portability are improved, but the ability to verify and audit transactions for specific physical equipment is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewallet portabilityVSAvoidtransaction auditability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-provisioning each physical device with a hardware-unique key during manufacturing. This unique key is used to generate a blockchain address that is permanently associated with the device before deployment, enabling both portability and auditability without requiring hardware binding during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a physical computing device generates a key pair upon initialization, then device-specific identification and audit trail creation are improved, but device complexity and initialization process are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice identification accuracyVSAvoidinitialization process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The physical computing device performs self-service by automatically generating its own hardware-unique key and corresponding blockchain address pair during initialization. The device independently creates its cryptographic identity without requiring external intervention, simplifying the overall system while maintaining high identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If an immutable blockchain record is created for tracking physical equipment, then transaction integrity and audit capability are improved, but system complexity and computational requirements are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction integrityVSAvoidblockchain system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential cryptographic elements (hardware-unique key and public address) needed for blockchain interaction, leaving the complex blockchain consensus and storage mechanisms to run separately on dedicated blockchain infrastructure. This extraction allows physical devices to participate in blockchain without bearing the full computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11424925B2Systems and methods for minting a physical device based on hardware unique key generation
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 VITRO TECHNOLOGY CORP
  • US11424925B2 patent drawing
  • US11424925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Minting a physical computing device based on unique key generation, wherein the key generation is configured to create a private-public key pair. In implementations, the key pair may be generated upon initialization of the physical computing device, such that the physical computing device is minted with the key pair. The key pair may be utilized as a token for supply-chain billings, payments, auditing, etc. associated with the physical computing device.