Harpoon Head Interchangeable Insert for Aircraft Anchoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft anchoring systems using harpoons on gratings face issues with repeated shocks causing the harpoon head to dull and lose effectiveness, leading to frequent replacements and increased costs due to complex structures, and high probabilities of disengagement due to edge contact during landing.

Innovation Solution

A harpoon head with an interchangeable, beveled metal insert made from high-hardness steel (30CrMo12) that can tilt and rotate to accommodate edge surfaces, reducing wear and improving anchoring by sliding into grating cells, and featuring a fastening mechanism for easy replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the harpoon head is made with a simple structure, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but the reliability of anchoring deteriorates due to frequent dulling and disengagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharpoon head structureVSAvoidanchoring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The harpoon head is divided into two separable parts: a reusable body and a wear insert. The insert can be easily replaced when worn, while the main body retains its structural integrity and functionality. This segmentation allows the complex wear-prone portion to be independently managed without replacing the entire harpoon head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert is made from a material with different hardness parameters compared to the harpoon head body. Specifically, the insert has higher hardness (HRC 50-60) than the body (HRC 30-40), optimizing the wear resistance at the critical contact surface while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of moving object

If the harpoon head uses a worn-resistant material, then the duration of action is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharpoon head service lifeVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Only the wear-prone insert portion is made from high-hardness material, while the main harpoon head body is made from more cost-effective material. This selective application of materials optimizes wear resistance where needed without unnecessarily increasing manufacturing costs for the entire component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert is designed as a consumable component that can be easily replaced when worn. This allows the use of more expensive high-hardness material only for the short-lived insert portion, rather than for the entire harpoon head, thereby controlling overall manufacturing costs while maintaining durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If the harpoon head has a fixed geometry, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the adaptability to edge surfaces deteriorates causing disengagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharpoon head geometry precisionVSAvoidadaptability to grating edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The insert is designed with geometric features that allow it to rotate and tilt relative to the harpoon head body during penetration. The rounded edges and specific angular dimensions enable the insert to dynamically adapt to edge surfaces, preventing disengagement while maintaining manufacturing precision through controlled geometric parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The insert features asymmetric geometry with rounded edges and specific angular dimensions that differ from standard cylindrical forms. This asymmetric design allows the insert to engage with edge surfaces more effectively by tilting and rotating, improving adaptability while still being manufacturable with precision tooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Reliability

If the harpoon head is replaced frequently, then the reliability is maintained, but the loss of time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring reliabilityVSAvoidtime for replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The harpoon head is segmented into a reusable body and a replaceable insert. When the insert wears out, only the small insert needs to be replaced, not the entire harpoon head. This dramatically reduces the time and cost of maintenance while maintaining anchoring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insert is designed as a consumable component that is discarded when worn and replaced with a new insert. The main harpoon head body is recovered and reused indefinitely. This approach minimizes waste and reduces the frequency and cost of replacements compared to replacing the entire harpoon head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS8876047B2Harpoon head and corresponding harpoon
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 DCNS SA
  • US8876047B2 patent drawing
  • US8876047B2 patent drawing
  • US8876047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A harpoon head (6) for a system for anchoring an aircraft on a grating (4) is characterized in that a distal end of the harpoon head has an interchangeable insert (20).