HARQ-ACK Feedback Segmentation for NR-U Overhead Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing feedback mechanisms in NR-U systems for HARQ-ACK feedback are inefficient due to excessive feedback amounts and high overheads, particularly in downlink HARQ-ACK feedback, which is not adequately supported by CBG-based feedback in FeLAA, necessitating a new design for HARQ-ACK codebooks.

Innovation Solution

A feedback information transmission method and apparatus that receive and process target information with a first information field containing M bits of feedback information and a second information field for determining correspondence with data channels or transmission resources, optimizing the feedback process by adjusting the number of target information pieces and using a new codebook design to reduce overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full codebook HARQ-ACK feedback is used in NR-U, then feedback reliability is improved, but feedback overhead increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback reliabilityVSAvoidfeedback overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the HARQ-ACK feedback into two parts: a first part indicating whether at least one CBG was received correctly, and a second part providing detailed CBG-level feedback only when needed. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliability through detailed feedback when necessary while reducing overhead by using simpler feedback when all CBGs are received correctly, resolving the contradiction between feedback reliability and overhead reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial feedback by providing detailed CBG-level feedback information only when necessary (when at least one CBG was not received correctly), rather than always providing full codebook feedback. This partial action approach reduces feedback overhead in successful transmissions while maintaining reliability when errors occur, addressing the contradiction between comprehensive feedback and overhead reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If CBG-based feedback is implemented in NR-U, then feedback precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback precisionVSAvoidcodebook design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feedback structure into a first feedback part (indicating at least one CBG received correctly) and a second feedback part (providing detailed CBG feedback). This segmentation simplifies the codebook design by using a two-stage feedback mechanism rather than requiring a completely new complex codebook structure, while still achieving CBG-based precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the feedback structure universal by using a unified feedback format that can handle both successful transmissions (first part only) and error cases (first and second parts). This multi-functional feedback structure reduces device complexity by avoiding separate codebook designs for different scenarios while maintaining the precision benefits of CBG-based feedback when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed CBG-level feedback is transmitted for all data channels, then measurement precision is improved, but feedback overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback precisionVSAvoidfeedback amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial feedback by transmitting detailed CBG-level feedback information only when necessary (when at least one CBG was not received correctly). For successful transmissions, only the first feedback part is sent. This partial action approach reduces the average feedback amount while maintaining high precision when errors occur, resolving the contradiction between feedback precision and feedback quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic feedback adaptation where the feedback structure changes based on transmission conditions. The feedback amount and detail level are dynamically adjusted: full detailed feedback when errors occur, simplified feedback when transmissions are successful. This dynamic approach maintains measurement precision when needed while significantly reducing average feedback overhead, addressing the contradiction between precision and quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12113624B2Feedback information transmission method and apparatus and communications device
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US12113624B2 patent drawing
  • US12113624B2 patent drawing
  • US12113624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of this application provide a feedback information transmission method and apparatus and a communications device. The method includes: receiving, by a first node, a group of target information sent by a second node, where each piece of target information in the group of target information includes a first information field and a second information field, the first information field includes M bits of feedback information for a group of data channels or a group of transmission resources, M is a positive integer, and the second information field is used for determining a correspondence between the first information field and the group of data channels or the group of transmission resources.