HARQ Feedback in Unlicensed Spectrum via Dynamic LBT

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing HARQ feedback designs for wireless communications in unlicensed spectrum bands face inefficiencies due to uncertainty from listen-before-talk (LBT) procedures, leading to potential missed transmissions and unnecessary retransmissions, especially when the device fails to transmit feedback at predefined times.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method improves HARQ feedback design by allowing feedback transmission without prior LBT in certain conditions, such as when the gap between downlink and uplink transmissions is small, and using dynamic codebook sizing based on LBT success, ensuring reliable feedback delivery even for missed transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If LBT procedure is performed before HARQ feedback transmission in unlicensed spectrum, then channel access compliance is ensured, but transmission reliability deteriorates due to uncertainty and potential missed transmissions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLBT procedure uncertaintyVSAvoidHARQ feedback transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the LBT procedure optional rather than fixed. The wireless device dynamically decides whether to perform LBT based on the gap size between downlink and uplink transmissions. When the gap is below a threshold, LBT is skipped; when above, LBT is performed. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing reliable feedback transmission without unnecessary LBT-induced uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of LBT execution based on the time gap condition. By using the gap size as a decision parameter, the system transitions from a static LBT requirement to a conditional one. This parameter-based approach allows the system to maintain reliability by skipping LBT in tight scheduling scenarios while complying with regulations in more relaxed scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If HARQ feedback is transmitted at predefined times, then feedback timing is simplified, but transmission reliability worsens due to LBT failures causing missed feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback timing simplicityVSAvoidfeedback delivery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic timing adjustment by allowing the wireless device to transmit feedback earlier than predefined times when the gap condition is met. Instead of rigidly following predefined feedback occasions, the device can adaptively transmit feedback as soon as the gap threshold is satisfied, thereby maintaining simplicity while improving reliability through flexible timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by enabling the wireless device to perform feedback transmission in advance of the predefined feedback time when conditions allow. By transmitting feedback earlier when the gap is small, the system ensures reliable delivery before LBT failures could occur at later predefined occasions, thus resolving the reliability issue while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If LBT is performed before every HARQ feedback transmission, then channel access is ensured, but throughput deteriorates due to unnecessary retransmissions and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access reliabilityVSAvoidHARQ feedback throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing LBT only when necessary - specifically when the gap between downlink and uplink transmissions exceeds the threshold. In cases where the gap is already small, LBT is omitted entirely. This partial application of LBT maintains channel access reliability where needed while avoiding the throughput degradation caused by unnecessary LBT procedures and retransmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the LBT execution parameter based on the gap condition. By using the time gap as a conditional parameter, the system avoids fixed LBT execution that would harm throughput. Instead, LBT is dynamically enabled or disabled based on whether the gap exceeds the threshold, thus maintaining reliability when needed while preserving throughput in tight scheduling scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If dynamic codebook sizing is used based on LBT success, then feedback efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHARQ feedback efficiencyVSAvoidcodebook management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the codebook size parameter dynamically based on LBT success outcomes. When LBT succeeds, a larger codebook can be used for comprehensive feedback; when LBT fails or is skipped, a smaller codebook is used. This parameter adaptation improves feedback efficiency by matching codebook size to actual transmission conditions while managing complexity through clear conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using the LBT success outcome to determine the appropriate codebook size for subsequent feedback transmission. The system continuously adapts the codebook parameter based on real-time LBT results, creating a feedback loop that optimizes efficiency. This dynamic feedback mechanism improves productivity while keeping complexity manageable through rule-based adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11539472B2Methods and apparatuses for hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ)
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11539472B2 patent drawing
  • US11539472B2 patent drawing
  • US11539472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses are disclosed for Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest Acknowledgement, HARQ-ACK, feedback. In one embodiment, a method implemented in a wireless device, WD, includes receiving, from a network node, a first Downlink Control Information, DCI, scheduling a physical downlink shared channel, PDSCH, and receiving, from the network node, a second DCI, the second DCI comprising a HARQ-ACK feedback request trigger triggering a HARQ-ACK feedback for the PDSCH scheduled by the first DCI. In another embodiment, a method implemented in a network node includes transmitting a first Downlink Control Information, DCI, scheduling the PDSCH, and transmitting a second DCI, the second DCI having a HARQ-ACK feedback request trigger triggering a HARQ-ACK feedback for the PDSCH scheduled by the first DCI.