HARQ Feedback Multiplexing for Partial Block Retransmission
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently supporting diverse requirements such as ultra-low transmission latency, ultra-reliable transmission, and multiple spectrum operating modes, particularly in 5G technologies, which are not adequately addressed by current methods.
Innovation Solution
Implementing a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) with a processor and transceiver configured to generate and send hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback, multiplexing feedback information across multiple transport blocks, and receiving retransmissions based on downlink control information to enhance data transmission robustness and efficiency.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional HARQ feedback methods are used, then implementation complexity is low, but data transmission reliability is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the transport block into multiple code blocks and provides per-code-block HARQ feedback. This allows the receiver to identify which specific code blocks were received successfully and which need retransmission, improving reliability without requiring complete retransmission of all blocks. The segmentation is implemented through dividing the transport block into K code blocks with individual CRCs, enabling granular feedback control.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements enhanced feedback mechanisms where the receiver provides detailed HARQ feedback indicating the success or failure of each code block reception. This feedback loop enables the transmitter to selectively retransmit only the failed code blocks, significantly improving data transmission reliability compared to traditional all-or-nothing retransmission approaches.
2Reliability
If retransmission is implemented for failed blocks, then data recovery capability improves, but transmission latency increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies partial retransmission by only retransmitting the specific code blocks that were received unsuccessfully, rather than retransmitting the entire transport block. This partial action approach reduces the retransmission time and improves latency performance while maintaining the reliability benefits of selective retransmission for only the failed blocks.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary actions by including CRC (cyclic redundancy check) information with each code block during the initial transmission. This allows the receiver to immediately identify which blocks need retransmission without requiring additional decoding time, enabling faster retransmission decisions and reducing overall latency.
3Productivity
If multiple code blocks are transmitted, then data throughput increases, but error detection difficulty increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the data into multiple code blocks, each with its own CRC for error detection. This segmentation approach allows the receiver to independently detect errors in each block using its dedicated CRC, making error detection simpler and more efficient compared to detecting errors in a single large transport block. The segmentation enables parallel processing of multiple blocks.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses CRC (cyclic redundancy check) as a copying mechanism that creates a simplified error detection signature for each code block. The CRC acts as a condensed version of the block contents that can be quickly computed and compared to detect errors without re-processing the entire block data, thus reducing detection complexity while maintaining thoroughness.
Data Source
AI summary
In some implementations, a WTRU may include receiving a first transport block (TB) of data. In addition, the WTRU may include determining that the first TB includes a first group of K blocks and a second group of K blocks. The WTRU may include generating first HARQ feedback information for the first TB, where first HARQ information may include, for each group of the first group and the second group, an acknowledgment (ACK) upon the WTRU successfully receiving K blocks in the group, or a negative acknowledgment (NACK) upon successfully receiving less than K blocks in the group. The WTRU may include sending the first HARQ feedback information. The WTRU may include receiving, in response to the first HARQ feedback information, DCI indicating that one or more blocks of a second transmission are a retransmission of part of the first TB; and receiving the second transmission based on the DCI.


