Harvester Camera Steering Control for Escort Vehicle Clearance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural harvesting machines face inefficiencies and potential collisions with accompanying vehicles due to manual steering inaccuracies and limited sensor-based collision avoidance systems, leading to reduced performance, dynamics, and increased repair costs.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing cameras and image processing, preferably with artificial intelligence, to delineate crop stands and accompanying vehicles, dynamically adjusting steering to prevent collisions by determining and maintaining safe distances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual steering is used to guide the harvester into the crop stand, then the operator can adjust the steering angle freely, but steering inaccuracies occur and individual rows may be left unharvested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual steering flexibilityVSAvoidsteering accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical steering control with an automated image processing system that uses cameras and AI algorithms to detect crop stand edges and calculate optimal steering angles, eliminating human error while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the harvester to autonomously navigate into and along the crop stand by automatically processing images to determine its own position relative to the crop edge and adjusting steering accordingly without continuous operator intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If sensors are used to detect the accompanying vehicle, then collision risk is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing camera system multi-functional by using it both for crop stand edge detection and accompanying vehicle detection, eliminating the need for separate sensor systems and reducing overall complexity while maintaining collision avoidance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the detection functions for crop boundaries and accompanying vehicles into a single image processing pipeline, where one camera system performs multiple detection tasks through unified AI algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the maximum steering angle is limited to prevent collisions, then safety is improved, but the performance and dynamics of the harvester are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidharvest performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic steering angle control where the system continuously monitors the distance to the accompanying vehicle and adjusts the steering angle in real-time, allowing large steering angles when safe and limiting them only when collision risk is detected, thus maintaining both safety and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If the field of view of sensors is manually defined, then the sensor coverage is controlled, but the performance and flexibility of the system are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor field of view controlVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the effective field of view based on the detected positions of the crop stand and accompanying vehicle, automatically expanding or contracting the monitoring area to maintain optimal coverage without manual intervention, thus enhancing flexibility while controlling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures reliable collision avoidance with minimal impact on harvest performance, allowing for flexible and dynamic steering adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

the processing unit is designed and configured to process at least one of the images in an image processing routine such that a crop and an accompanying vehicle in a field are delineated and identified from the remaining area of the field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage processing: Image Processing

Data Source

PatentEP4449849B1System for avoiding a collision between an agricultural harvester and a companion vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP4449849B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4449849B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4449849B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system (12) for preventing collisions between an agricultural harvester (1) and an escort vehicle (11). The system (12) comprises a processing unit (13) and at least one camera (14) for image acquisition (16) of the front environment (15) of the harvester (1). Based on the determination of a crop stand (5) and an escort vehicle (11) in an image processing routine, both a crop edge (10) and its position, as well as an outermost edge (17) of the escort vehicle (11) and its position, are determined. If a defined distance between the position of the crop edge (10) and the position of the outermost edge (17) of the escort vehicle (11) falls below a certain threshold, an event is triggered to prevent an impending collision between the agricultural harvester (1) and the escort vehicle (11). For this purpose, a captured image (16) is segmented and the segments (18) are classified.Subsequently, polygons (19, 20) are formed to determine the segment boundaries (21) in order to determine the distance.