Combine Harvester Feed Rate Control for Blockage Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combine harvesters face challenges in maintaining a constant feed rate due to variations in crop height, density, and ground speed, leading to potential blockages and inefficiencies in crop processing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a feedback sensor to measure the current feed rate and a feed forward sensor to predict the future feed rate, with a controller adjusting operational settings based on discrepancies between the two to stabilize crop flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If feed rate is increased to improve harvesting productivity, then productivity increases, but blockages in crop processing parts occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed rateVSAvoidblockage prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feed forward sensor detects biomass ahead of the header before the crop enters the processing system. The controller uses this advance information to predict upcoming feed rate increases and proactively adjusts operational settings (reel speed, draper belt speed, ground speed) to prevent blockages before they occur, rather than reacting after blockages happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts multiple operational parameters (reel rotational speed, draper belt speed, ground speed) in real-time based on predicted and actual feed rate conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the harvester to maintain optimal feed rate while preventing blockages under varying crop conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If feed rate is decreased to prevent blockages, then reliability improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockage preventionVSAvoidfeed rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By detecting biomass ahead of the header, the system knows in advance when feed rate will increase. This allows proactive adjustment of operational settings to maintain high feed rate while preventing blockages, rather than conservatively limiting feed rate to avoid potential blockages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback sensor continuously monitors actual feed rate and provides real-time information to the controller. The controller compares actual feed rate with predicted feed rate and adjusts operational settings to maintain optimal feed rate while preventing blockages, enabling high productivity with reliable blockage prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If feed forward sensor is added to predict future feed rate, then prediction accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed rate prediction accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feed forward sensor acts as an intermediary that detects biomass ahead of the header, providing advance information about upcoming feed rate changes. This allows the controller to predict and prepare for feed rate variations, improving prediction accuracy while the complexity is managed by integrating the sensor into the existing control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Stability of the object's composition

If multiple operational parameters are continuously adjusted to maintain constant feed rate, then feed rate stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed rate stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback sensor continuously monitors actual feed rate and provides real-time information to the controller. The controller compares actual feed rate with predicted feed rate and automatically adjusts operational settings to maintain stable feed rate, improving feed rate stability while using automated control to manage system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts multiple operational parameters (reel speed, draper belt speed, ground speed) in real-time based on predicted and actual feed rate conditions. This dynamic adaptation allows the harvester to maintain optimal feed rate while preventing blockages under varying crop conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260076303A1Combine harvester feed rate control
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • US20260076303A1 patent drawing
  • US20260076303A1 patent drawing
  • US20260076303A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural harvester includes a header, a feedback sensor for generating a feedback signal representative of a current feed rate of crop through the harvester, a feed forward sensor for generating a feed forward signal representative of a biomass of crop ahead of the header, and a controller operably coupled to the feedback sensor and the feed forward sensor. The controller determines a predicted feed rate of crop through the harvester based on the feed forward signal and an actual feed rate of crop through the harvester based on the feedback signal. The controller controls an operational setting of the agricultural harvester in dependence of a discrepancy between the predicted feed rate and the actual feed rate.