Harvester Head Saw Selection for Stem Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current harvester head operations in the forestry industry require multiple passes along a stem for delimbing, measurement, and cutting, increasing fuel consumption, processing time, and operator fatigue, while also potentially damaging softer woods and reducing value due to bruising.

Innovation Solution

An electronic control device and system that uses a processor to determine cutting positions and select between a main saw and a topping saw based on stem diameter and cutting capacity, optimizing cutting positions to minimize travel distance and reduce operator decision-making, thereby reducing processing time and damage to the wood.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the harvester head travels along the stem three times (once for delimbing, once to return to LED, and once for cutting), then the cutting solution can be determined after measurement, but fuel consumption increases and processing time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic cutting solution determinationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement and stores diameter data at multiple positions along the stem during the delimbing pass. The cutting solution is then executed in a single subsequent pass using pre-calculated cut positions, eliminating the need to return to the LED and reducing total passes from three to two.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual operator decision-making with an automated control device that uses stored measurement data to determine optimal cutting positions. This substitution allows the cutting solution to be implemented efficiently without requiring the harvester to reposition multiple times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the harvester head travels along the stem three times, then complete processing is achieved, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete stem processingVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

All necessary measurement and data collection is performed during the initial delimbing pass. The cutting solution is pre-calculated based on stored diameter measurements, allowing the cutting operation to be completed in a single efficient pass without requiring additional trips along the stem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control device replaces manual operation by calculating optimal cutting positions based on pre-stored measurement data. This automation eliminates the need for the operator to make multiple passes to assess and execute the cutting solution, thereby reducing fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the operator manually decides which saw to use at each cutting position, then cutting capacity can be matched to stem diameter, but operator fatigue increases and decision-making time is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaw selection based on stem diameterVSAvoidoperator fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated control device replaces manual operator decision-making with algorithm-based saw selection. The system automatically compares the stem diameter at each cutting position with the cutting capacities of available saws and selects the appropriate saw, eliminating operator fatigue and decision-time while maintaining optimal matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-assessment by automatically evaluating stem diameter measurements and selecting the most appropriate saw for each cutting position based on pre-programmed cutting capacity parameters. This self-service capability eliminates the need for continuous operator intervention and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If the stem is driven multiple times along its length, then cutting operations can be performed, but damage to softer woods increases due to bruising

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting operation completionVSAvoidwood bruising and damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs all measurement and cutting solution calculation during the initial delimbing pass. All subsequent cutting operations are executed in a single pass using pre-determined cut positions, minimizing the number of times the stem is driven through the feed mechanism and reducing cumulative damage to softer woods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated control system optimizes the cutting pass sequence to minimize stem movement. By calculating all cut positions in advance and executing them in a single efficient pass, the system reduces the number of feed mechanism engagements and minimizes bruising damage compared to manual multi-pass operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10321638B2System, device, and method for processing a length of material
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 WARATAH NZ
  • US10321638B2 patent drawing
  • US10321638B2 patent drawing
  • US10321638B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, device, and method for processing a length of material are provided. A material-working device has first and second cutting devices, each having different cutting capacities. Data relating to the length and diameter at a plurality of points of the material is received, and used to determine at least one cutting position along its length. The diameter of the length of material at the cutting position is determined, and used to select either the first cutting device or second cutting device for use in performing a cut at the cutting position based on the cutting capacity of each cutting device.