Agricultural Harvester Header and Feedroll Synchronization Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesting machines face issues with uneven crop material cutting and processing due to mismatched speeds between the header and feedrolls, leading to blockages, material loss, and irregular cutting lengths, especially when handling different types of crops.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a controller-driven synchronization system that adjusts the speed and load of the header and feedrolls through primary and secondary synchronization procedures, ensuring the speed and load ratios fall within predetermined ranges to optimize crop material throughput and prevent blockages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the header speed is increased to improve productivity, then crop material throughput is improved, but material blockage and uneven cutting occur due to speed mismatch with feedrolls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop material throughputVSAvoidmaterial flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the header and feedroll speeds variable and adjustable rather than fixed. The control system dynamically adjusts the speeds of both header and feedrolls to maintain optimal speed ratios, allowing the system to adapt to different operating conditions and prevent blockages while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the speed parameters of both header and feedrolls to optimize performance. By adjusting both speeds rather than just one, the system maintains the correct speed ratio under varying conditions, preventing material blockage while maximizing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the feedroll speed is increased to improve processing capacity, then crop material processing is improved, but material is torn apart and irregular cutting occurs due to speed mismatch with header

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop material processing capacityVSAvoidcutting length uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts feedroll speed based on header speed and operating conditions to maintain the optimal speed ratio. This prevents the feedrolls from rotating too fast relative to the header, which would cause material to be grasped and torn apart, thereby ensuring uniform cutting length while maintaining processing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors the speeds of header and feedrolls and adjusts them based on feedback to maintain the correct speed ratio. This feedback mechanism ensures that the feedroll speed matches the header speed appropriately, preventing material damage and ensuring consistent cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If independent drive mechanisms are used for header and feedrolls to improve operational flexibility, then adaptability to different crops is improved, but speed synchronization becomes difficult leading to material loss and blockages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidspeed synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the speeds of independently driven header and feedrolls and adjusts them to maintain the optimal speed ratio. This feedback control enables the system to benefit from independent drives for flexibility while automatically maintaining proper synchronization to prevent material loss and blockages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system provides multiple functions: it can operate with fixed speed ratios for simple applications or dynamically adjust speeds for optimized performance. This universal control approach handles both synchronization automatically and allows manual intervention when needed, accommodating different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3016497B1Drive mechanism control in an agricultural harvester
Publication Date: 2017.09.06 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP3016497B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3016497B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An agricultural harvester (1) comprises a controller operationally connected to at least the drive mechanism of header(10) and the drive mechanism of the feedrolls (20, 21, 26, 27) to control these drive mechanisms. The controller successively executes a primary and a secondary synchronization procedure, wherein the primary synchronization procedure controls the header and feedroll drive mechanisms such that the header rotating speed and feedroll rotating speed are in a first predetermined ratio range; and the secondary synchronization procedure controls the header and feedroll drive mechanisms such that the header load and the feedroll load approach a second predetermined ratio.