Harvester Header Compatibility Control for Load-Limited Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural harvesters face challenges in efficiently managing the compatibility of wider, heavier headers with varying harvester capabilities, leading to potential fatigue and reduced component life due to high loads during operation.

Innovation Solution

An agricultural harvester system with a header compatibility control system that includes sensors and a controller to measure characteristics, determine load thresholds, and adjust operations such as speed, hydraulic pressure, and header height to maintain compatibility and reduce stress on components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wider, heavier headers are used to increase productivity, then crop harvesting coverage is improved, but the load on the harvester components increases causing fatigue and reduced component life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop harvesting coverageVSAvoidcomponent life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operational parameters (speed, hydraulic pressure, header height) based on real-time load measurements. The controller modifies these parameters during operation to maintain the harvester within safe load thresholds, allowing the use of wider headers while preventing excessive stress on components through adaptive control rather than static operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor system continuously monitors load characteristics and provides feedback to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to determine when restricted conditions apply and automatically adjusts operational parameters to keep the load within safe limits, creating a closed-loop control system that protects components while maximizing header width for productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the harvester operates at higher speeds to improve productivity, then harvesting efficiency is improved, but the load and stress on components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidload on components
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operational parameters (speed, hydraulic pressure, header height) based on real-time load measurements. The controller modifies these parameters during operation to maintain the harvester within safe load thresholds, allowing the use of wider headers while preventing excessive stress on components through adaptive control rather than static operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes operational parameters (speed, hydraulic pressure, header height) based on load conditions. When high loads are detected, the system reduces speed or adjusts hydraulic pressure to keep the overall load within safe thresholds, allowing high productivity at normal loads while preventing excessive force at high speeds through parameter modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If hydraulic pressure is increased to improve actuator performance, then header positioning control is improved, but the risk of excessive load and component stress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader positioning controlVSAvoidhydraulic pressure stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system continuously monitors load characteristics and provides feedback to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to determine when restricted conditions apply and automatically adjusts operational parameters to keep the load within safe limits, creating a closed-loop control system that protects components while maximizing header width for productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes operational parameters (speed, hydraulic pressure, header height) based on load conditions. When high loads are detected, the system reduces speed or adjusts hydraulic pressure to keep the overall load within safe thresholds, allowing high productivity at normal loads while preventing excessive force at high speeds through parameter modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250241242A1Agricultural Harvester Header Compatibility Control
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 DEERE & CO
  • US20250241242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250241242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250241242A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural harvester include a header compatibility control system having a first sensor measures characteristic of the agricultural harvester and generates a signal indicative of the characteristic and a controller. The controller includes a processor and a memory having a compatibility control algorithm. The processor is operable to execute the compatibility control algorithm to: receive the signal indicative of the characteristic from the first sensor to determine a load; determine, based on the signal, whether the load is equal to or greater than a first threshold; calculate, if the load is determined to be equal to or greater than the first threshold, a restricted condition based on the load, and control the agricultural harvester to operate in the restricted condition in response to the load being equal to or greater than the first threshold.