Harvester Operating Mode Identification via Hydraulic Pressure Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing monitoring systems for harvesters provide limited and imprecise information on operating modes, failing to accurately distinguish between harvesting, maneuvering, transport, and waiting modes, leading to inefficiencies in crop harvesting operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and control system that monitors hydraulic pressures in harvesting devices to identify operating modes, using pressure limits and current operating pressures to determine whether the harvester is in harvesting, maneuvering, transport, or waiting modes, and updates these limits continuously to account for changes in hydraulic system conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing monitoring systems only assess the state of a harvesting switch, then the system complexity is low, but the measurement precision of operating mode identification is limited and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating mode identification accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring system into multiple independent sensor channels, each monitoring specific parameters (hydraulic pressure, flow rate, engine speed, ground speed) for different harvesting devices. This segmentation allows precise identification of operating modes through coordinated data from multiple sensors without creating a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system uses multiple sensors that can serve multiple functions. For example, hydraulic pressure sensors monitor both individual device operation and overall system status, while ground speed data contributes to determining both transport mode and harvesting mode. This multi-functionality improves measurement precision without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If hydraulic pressure monitoring is continuously updated with multiple thresholds, then the operating mode identification accuracy is improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating mode classification accuracyVSAvoidpressure limit update mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically updates pressure limits based on current operating conditions rather than using fixed thresholds. The controller continuously adjusts reference pressure values for each harvesting device based on real-time hydraulic system state, enabling accurate operating mode identification across varying conditions without requiring excessively complex computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system implements feedback mechanisms where pressure measurements from hydraulic circuits are continuously compared against updated reference limits, and the results feed back into adjusting the pressure limits for subsequent comparisons. This feedback loop refines operating mode detection accuracy while maintaining manageable computational complexity through iterative adjustment rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple hydraulic circuits are monitored simultaneously, then the reliability of operating mode determination is improved, but the device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating mode determination reliabilityVSAvoidmulti-circuit monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors multiple hydraulic circuits independently, with each circuit associated with specific harvesting devices. By segmenting the monitoring into circuit-specific channels with dedicated pressure sensors and evaluation logic, the system achieves reliable multi-device monitoring without creating an intractably complex integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes pressure limit thresholds for each hydraulic circuit before operation begins or before mode transitions occur. This preliminary setup of reference values for multiple circuits allows the system to reliably determine operating modes through straightforward comparison operations rather than requiring complex real-time calculations across all circuits simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9807931B2Monitoring of operating modes for harvesters
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 DEERE & CO
  • US9807931B2 patent drawing
  • US9807931B2 patent drawing
  • US9807931B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and control system are disclosed for monitoring operating modes of a harvester. A harvester may include one or more harvesting devices driven by one or more hydraulic circuits. A lower pressure limit and a current operating pressure may be determined for a hydraulic circuit of a harvesting device. The determined pressure limit and operating pressure may be compared, and a current operating mode for the harvester identified accordingly. The operating mode may include at least one of a waiting mode, a transport mode, a maneuvering mode, and a harvesting mode.