Combine Harvester Rake Transfer Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing combine harvester designs face challenges in optimizing the crop flow from the cutterbar to the inclined conveyor, particularly at the transfer opening, where the conveying effect is minimal due to the limited effective length of draw-in fingers, leading to suboptimal crop transfer and potential blockages or losses.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a packer mechanism with rake tines and a crank drive system, allowing the packer to move on a curved path that deviates from circular to oval, effectively increasing the conveying area and improving crop flow by maintaining downward orientation of tines to prevent vertical acceleration and blockages, with a guide device for enhanced rotational positioning and adjustable pendulum rods for optimized movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If draw-in fingers are used with minimal effective length at the transfer opening, then the device structure is simplified, but the conveying effect on harvested crop is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransfer device structureVSAvoidcrop flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by replacing static draw-in fingers with a movable packer mechanism that rotates on a crank arm. The packer's effective conveying length varies dynamically during rotation, being minimal at the transfer opening and maximum away from it. This dynamic configuration allows the packer to maintain structural simplicity while achieving sufficient conveying effect through its rotational motion and varying effective length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the packer moves on a circular path, then the mechanism is simple, but the conveying area is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement mechanismVSAvoidconveying area
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dimensionality change principle by transforming the packer's movement path from a simple circular trajectory to an oval path through the introduction of a guide device with pendulum rods. This oval path extends the conveying area in the width direction of the cutterbar while maintaining mechanical simplicity. The guide device constrains the packer to follow this extended elliptical trajectory, effectively utilizing space in a new dimensional arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If the packer tines are oriented vertically, then the structure is simple, but vertical acceleration causes blockages and losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacker structureVSAvoidcrop flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the packer tines rotate together with the packer mechanism rather than remaining fixed vertically. This dynamic orientation ensures that the tines maintain an optimal angle relative to the crop flow direction throughout the rotation cycle, preventing vertical acceleration that would cause blockages. The rotating tine configuration adapts continuously to the changing positions during the oval path movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Length of moving object

If the effective length of draw-in fingers is minimized at the transfer opening, then the device is compact, but the crop transfer effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffective length of transfer deviceVSAvoidcrop transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by implementing a rotational packer mechanism where the effective conveying length varies continuously during rotation. At the transfer opening position, the effective length is minimal, maintaining compactness. As the packer rotates away from the transfer opening, the effective length increases, maximizing crop engagement. This dynamic variation allows the device to achieve both compactness and high transfer efficiency at different positions in its cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3959959A1Combine harvester
Publication Date: 2022.03.02 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP3959959A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3959959A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3959959A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present application relates to a combine harvester (1) comprising a cutting unit (2) for cutting and conveying plants (3) growing in a field and an inclined conveyor (4) for conveying the plants towards a threshing unit (5), wherein the cutting unit (2) has at least one conveying device (7) extending parallel to a longitudinal axis (6) of the cutting unit (2), by means of which cut plants can be conveyed from side regions (8, 9) of the cutting unit (2) towards a central region (10) of the cutting unit (2), wherein the cutting unit (2) has at least one transfer device by means of which cut plants can be transferred from the central region (10) to the inclined conveyor (4), characterized in that the transfer device is designed in the form of a rake (11) which is configured to receive the cut plants and transfer them to the inclined conveyor (4).In order to provide a combine harvester in which the flow of the respective harvested crop from the cutting unit to the inclined conveyor is improved compared to the prior art, it is proposed according to the invention that the transfer device is designed in the form of a rake (11) which is designed to receive the cut plants and transfer them to the inclined conveyor (4).