Harvester Roller Support Wear Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing harvester headers face challenges in accommodating terrain changes while maintaining efficient support for draper belts, leading to wear and tear issues with existing bearing arrangements.

Innovation Solution

A harvester header design featuring a roller support system with a base, arm, and immovable wear structure, where the wear surface is removable and biased to wear more slowly, reducing maintenance costs and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing bearing arrangements are used to support rollers and float arms, then the header can accommodate terrain changes, but wear and tear issues occur with the bearing components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptationVSAvoidbearing wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing arrangement is segmented into a stationary wear structure (first wear structure) attached to the float arm and a movable wear structure (second wear structure) attached to the roller support. This segmentation allows the wear surfaces to be separated and independently replaced, resolving the contradiction by enabling terrain adaptation while minimizing bearing wear through replaceable wear surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wear structures are designed as replaceable, consumable components that can be easily replaced when worn. This allows the use of simpler, less expensive materials for the wear surfaces that can be periodically replaced, rather than using durable but complex bearing arrangements, thus resolving the contradiction between terrain adaptation and bearing wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Duration of action of stationary object

If wear structures are made durable and fixed, then component longevity increases, but maintenance complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent longevityVSAvoidmaintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The wear structures are segmented into modular, replaceable components that can be independently removed and replaced. This segmentation maintains component longevity through durable wear surfaces while reducing maintenance complexity by allowing quick replacement of only the worn wear structures rather than entire assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wear surfaces are extracted as separate, removable components from the main float arm and roller support structures. This extraction allows the wear surfaces to be replaced independently without replacing the entire bearing arrangement, thus maintaining longevity while simplifying maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Stability of the object's composition

If rollers are firmly supported to maintain stability, then draper belt support is improved, but adaptability to terrain changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedraper belt support stabilityVSAvoidterrain adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The roller support is designed with dynamic capability through the replaceable wear structures that allow relative movement between the roller support and float arm. This dynamic design maintains draper belt support stability through the wear surfaces while enabling terrain adaptability through the ability of the roller support to move relative to the float arm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design allows for relative movement of rollers and float arms with the harvester header to adapt to terrain changes, reducing wear on critical components and simplifying maintenance by allowing easy replacement of wear surfaces, thus enhancing operational efficiency and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

The second wear structure has a second wear surface facing downwardly such that the second wear surface is in abutting contact with and is slidable relative to the first wear surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3476200B1Draper belt roller support and harvester header comprising roller support
Publication Date: 2020.06.10 DEERE & CO
  • EP3476200B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3476200B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3476200B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A roller support for draper belt supporting rollers of a harvester header may include a base, a first post extending from the base in a direction to support a first roller, a second post extending from the base in the direction to support a second roller, an arm extending from the base in the direction between the first post and the second post and a wear structure supported by and immovable relative to the arm. The wear structure may have a wear surface facing downwardly. A harvester header comprises: first and second draper belts; first roller about which the first draper belt wraps; second roller about which the second draper belt wraps; a float arm; a first wear structure removably mounted to the float arm and providing a first wear surface facing upwardly; and a roller support supporting first and second rollers, said support comprising: a base; an arm extending from the base towards the float arm; and a second wear structure supported by and immovable relative to the arm, the second wear structure having a second wear surface facing downwardly, the second wear surface being in abutting contact with and slidable relative to the first wear surface.