Harvester Sensor Arrangement for Crop Property Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current harvesting machines face measurement uncertainty in crop properties due to fluctuations in straw toughness and friction coefficients, leading to inefficiencies and potential crop losses, as they primarily rely on throughput measurements without accounting for varying crop conditions.

Innovation Solution

A harvesting machine equipped with a sensor arrangement including cutting force, friction force, and moisture sensors, along with an evaluation device to determine straw toughness and friction coefficients, allowing for precise adjustments in operating conditions and optimizing crop processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If throughput measurement is used to determine crop properties, then the harvesting machine can operate with simpler sensor arrangements, but measurement precision deteriorates due to fluctuations in straw toughness and friction coefficients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor arrangement complexityVSAvoidcrop property determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor arrangement is segmented into functionally independent sensors: a cutting force sensor for detecting cutting resistance, a friction force sensor for detecting friction coefficients, and a moisture sensor for detecting moisture content. Each sensor measures a specific parameter, allowing independent optimization and reducing overall system complexity while improving measurement precision through multi-parameter monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation device serves multiple functions: it processes signals from different sensor types (cutting force, friction force, moisture), determines multiple crop properties (straw toughness, friction coefficients, moisture content), and provides comprehensive crop condition assessment. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated measurement systems for each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are added to improve measurement precision, then crop property determination accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop property determination accuracyVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is divided into distinct functional modules: cutting force sensor, friction force sensor, and moisture sensor. Each module independently measures a specific physical quantity related to crop properties. This segmentation allows for modular design, easier maintenance, and reduced interference between sensors, thereby managing complexity while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation device acts as an intermediary that processes and integrates signals from multiple sensors. It combines cutting force signals, friction force signals, and moisture signals to comprehensively determine crop properties such as straw toughness and friction coefficients. This intermediary approach simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing the processing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If crop processing parameters are adjusted based on inaccurate throughput measurements, then the harvesting machine can maintain simple control systems, but reliability deteriorates due to measurement uncertainty from varying crop conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcrop processing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors crop properties through multiple sensors (cutting force, friction force, moisture) and provides real-time feedback to the control system. The evaluation device processes these signals to determine current crop conditions, enabling dynamic adjustment of harvesting parameters. This feedback mechanism improves reliability by ensuring control decisions are based on accurate, real-time crop condition data rather than uncertain throughput measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor arrangement continuously measures crop properties (straw toughness, friction coefficients, moisture content) before and during the harvesting process. This preliminary detection allows the control system to anticipate and adjust to changing crop conditions proactively, preventing processing issues before they occur and improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4256939B1Crop harvesting machine and method for determining the characteristics of harvested material
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 SMF HLDG GMBH
  • EP4256939B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

Harvesting machine for cutting and processing crops, comprising a sensor arrangement, a method for determining the properties of crops when processing the crops with a harvesting machine, and a method for determining the properties of crops in a field.