Harvester Speed Control via Dual-Loop Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Combine harvesters face inefficiencies and mechanical stress due to varying crop densities, leading to overloading, grain loss, and maintenance issues, as existing control systems based on threshing drum torque are inaccurate and delayed in responding to density changes.

Innovation Solution

A dual-loop control system with sensors measuring header and straw elevator drive torque, and a sensing pulley to detect drive belt tension, allowing for immediate adjustment of ground speed to maintain optimal crop flow, incorporating a static gain estimator to adjust control loop gains and account for varying conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the combine harvester drives at constant speed through the field, then the work rate is maximized, but the straw elevator becomes overloaded when encountering high crop density regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework rateVSAvoidstraw elevator overload
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system using sensors to detect crop density and feed rate, continuously adjusting the ground speed to maintain optimal harvesting conditions. The control system processes sensor signals and adjusts the combine's speed in real-time, preventing straw elevator overload while maximizing work rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from constant speed operation to dynamic speed adjustment. The ground speed is continuously varied based on real-time crop density detection, allowing the combine to adapt its operating parameters to match actual field conditions and prevent overloading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the combine harvester increases speed to maximize work rate, then productivity improves, but grain loss increases due to insufficient processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework rateVSAvoidgrain loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system monitors feed rate and crop density, adjusting ground speed to maintain optimal processing capacity utilization. This ensures sufficient processing time is provided even at higher speeds, preventing grain loss while maximizing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the ground speed parameter based on crop density and feed rate conditions. By adjusting this key parameter in real-time, the system optimizes the balance between productivity and grain loss prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If visual inspection by the driver is used to adjust speed, then some adaptation to crop density is achieved, but the response is insufficiently accurate and timely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustmentVSAvoidcrop density detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with automated sensor-based detection systems. Optical sensors, torque sensors, and feed rate monitors objectively measure crop density and feed conditions, providing precise data for control decisions without relying on driver perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment based on sensor feedback, automatically modifying ground speed without requiring continuous driver intervention. The system serves itself by monitoring its own operating parameters and making corrections to maintain optimal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If existing control systems based on threshing drum torque are used, then some control is achieved, but the response is delayed and inaccurate due to the time lag for crop to reach the threshing drum

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic speed controlVSAvoidcontrol response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent measures crop density and feed rate at the header assembly, where crop enters the combine, rather than at the threshing drum. This preliminary measurement allows the control system to anticipate and respond to feed rate changes before they affect downstream processing, eliminating the time lag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate measurement points at the header assembly and straw elevator, which serve as early warning indicators of feed rate changes. These intermediary sensors provide advance notice of conditions that would otherwise only be detected later in the processing sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system provides accurate and immediate control of ground speed, reducing grain loss, fuel consumption, and mechanical stress, while maintaining operator comfort by detecting crop density changes near the header assembly, thus enhancing harvesting efficiency and reducing maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

A sensing pulley is provided for detecting drive belt tension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension detection: Tension

Data Source

PatentEP2057880B1Apparatus and method for controlling the speed of a harvesting machine
Publication Date: 2011.09.21 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP2057880B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2057880B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2057880B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Apparatus for controlling the speed of a combine harvester (10) comprises one or more sensors (48) each generating one or more signals (28, 36) that correspond during use of the combine harvester to variables of a harvesting process; a processor; and one or more control devices operatively connected in a feedback arrangement comprising two loops in a first of which a first said signal (28) corresponding to the ground speed of the combine harvester (10) is fed back as an input to a first said control device (42) that is capable of adjusting the said ground speed relative to a set value; and in a second of which the said first signal (28) is fed together with a second said signal (34) indicative of the flow rate of crop through the combine harvester to a second said control device (32) that generates as a third signal (31) the said set value, the third signal being input to the first said control device (42).