Hashed Package Validation via Acceptance Frames
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current systems for verifying data receipt and access lack efficiency and accuracy, often requiring third-party verification, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Innovation Solution
A method and system that utilize an acceptance frame and hashing algorithms to validate the receipt and access of data by creating and comparing hashed packages between a processing server and a computing device, allowing for secure and efficient verification without the need for a third party.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If third-party verification systems are used to confirm data receipt and access, then verification reliability is improved, but system complexity and resource consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the verification function from third-party systems and implements it directly within the hashing module. By incorporating the acceptance frame validation and hashing verification internally, the system eliminates the need for external third-party verification infrastructure, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining verification reliability through cryptographic hashing
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs self-verification by generating and validating its own hashed packages with acceptance frames. The hashing module creates cryptographic proofs of data access that can be independently verified without requiring external trusted third parties, enabling the system to serve its own verification needs and reducing dependency on external systems
2Measurement precision
If third-party verification systems are used to confirm data receipt and access, then verification accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-generating hashed packages with acceptance frames embedded in them. The hashing module creates these cryptographic verification packages in advance, so when data receipt needs verification, the comparison can be performed immediately without requiring time-consuming third-party intervention, thus reducing verification time while maintaining accuracy
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces mechanical third-party verification systems with cryptographic hashing mechanisms. By substituting physical or procedural third-party verification with mathematical hashing and comparison operations, the system achieves rapid automated verification that maintains high accuracy while dramatically reducing time consumption
3Reliability
If resource-intensive third-party verification systems are deployed, then data access verification reliability is improved, but resource consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the resource-intensive third-party verification functionality and replaces it with lightweight cryptographic hashing operations performed locally by the hashing module. This extraction eliminates the need for resource-heavy external verification infrastructure while maintaining verification reliability through mathematically sound hashing algorithms
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses computationally efficient hashing operations that consume minimal resources compared to third-party verification systems. The hashed packages are generated and validated through lightweight cryptographic operations that can be performed rapidly with low energy consumption, effectively replacing expensive resource-intensive verification mechanisms
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3A
AI summary
A method for validating receipt of hashed data includes: storing an acceptance frame and at least one hashing algorithm; receiving a data value; hashing the received data value using the at least one hashing algorithm to obtain a first hashed package; hashing the received data value and the acceptance frame using the at least one hashing algorithm to obtain a second hashed package; electronically transmitting the first hashed package to a computing device; receiving a received hashed package from the computing device; and validating the received hashed package as being created using the received data value and acceptance frame via comparison of the received hashed package to the second hashed package.