Hazard Detector Self-Test via Microphone Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hazard detection systems lack an efficient method for self-testing their audible components, such as alarms and speakers, without human intervention, which is crucial for ensuring their functionality and reliability in alerting users to potential hazards.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for self-administering sound tests on hazard detection systems using mobile devices, where users can initiate and configure sound tests remotely, and the system uses a microphone to verify the operation of alarms and speakers, eliminating the need for human presence and minimizing interference between multiple systems in a common structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated self-testing is implemented, then testing reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hazard detection system automatically tests its own audible components using its integrated microphone to capture and analyze alarm sounds, eliminating the need for external testing equipment or human intervention. The system self-administers the sound test by comparing captured audio characteristics against predefined thresholds to determine component functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures audio output from the alarm through its microphone, processes the sound characteristics, and uses this feedback to automatically determine whether the audible components are functioning within acceptable parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables automated reliability verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If remote testing is enabled, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual physical presence and human judgment with electronic audio capture and automated digital analysis. The microphone captures sound waves and converts them to electrical signals, which are then processed algorithmically to determine alarm functionality, substituting mechanical human testing with electronic measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The microphone acts as an intermediary device between the alarm sound source and the analysis system, capturing acoustic energy and converting it to an analyzable electrical signal. This intermediary enables remote testing by mediating the transfer of sound information without requiring direct human contact or presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple systems test simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but harmful factors increase due to sound interference

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsound interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements staggered testing schedules where multiple hazard detection systems perform sound tests at different time intervals rather than simultaneously. This periodic action with time separation eliminates sound interference between systems while maintaining overall testing productivity across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables remote, automated verification of audible components' operation, ensuring timely alerts and reducing user disturbance, while preventing overlapping sound tests among multiple systems through staggered testing schedules, thus enhancing the reliability and efficiency of hazard detection systems.

Implementation Method 1

uses a microphone to verify the operation of alarms and speakers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS10078959B2Systems and methods for testing hazard detectors in a smart home
Publication Date: 2018.09.18 GOOGLE LLC
  • US10078959B2 patent drawing
  • US10078959B2 patent drawing
  • US10078959B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for self-administering test to verify operation of various components within a hazard detection system are described herein. Users may be able interact with their mobile devices to control and monitor the results of test being administered by the hazard detection system. The mobile device may receive status updates from a central server that receives data from one or more hazard detection systems within a structure. The status information may be displayed on the user's device to inform the user of potential issues that any of his or her hazard detection systems may have.