Hazard Function Modeling for Power Asset Failure Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for predicting asset degradation in electric power systems lack objectivity and rely heavily on assumptions or human expert knowledge, complicating maintenance planning and increasing the risk of unexpected failures.

Innovation Solution

A method and processing system that estimate a hazard function for asset failure using outage data collected during field operations, incorporating maintenance data to determine hazard function parameters in a data-driven manner, thereby improving the objectivity of asset state prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional predictive techniques are used for asset degradation monitoring, then expert knowledge and assumptions can guide maintenance planning, but the objectivity and accuracy of failure risk prediction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expert-based subjective judgment with an automated statistical modeling system that processes outage data to estimate hazard functions. The processing system automatically fits probability distributions to historical data, eliminating the need for manual expert assessment while improving objectivity and accuracy of failure risk predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating maintenance recommendations based on data-driven hazard function estimates. The processing system independently analyzes outage data, determines appropriate probability distributions, and produces actionable insights without requiring continuous expert intervention, thereby reducing maintenance planning complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If more comprehensive outage data is collected and processed, then the objectivity of hazard function estimation improves, but the data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complex outage data into standardized hazard function parameters by fitting probability distributions. The processing system changes the parameter representation from raw outage records to condensed statistical parameters (mean, standard deviation, shape parameters) that capture essential failure characteristics while reducing data complexity for downstream analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts essential failure risk characteristics from comprehensive outage data by estimating hazard functions and their parameters. It separates the critical information (failure rates, distribution shapes) from the raw data complexity, retaining only the necessary parameters needed for reliable prediction while discarding redundant details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If hazard function parameters are determined without considering maintenance data, then the estimation process is simpler, but the accuracy of asset state prediction in presence of maintenance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset state prediction accuracyVSAvoidparameter determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic parameter determination approach that adapts hazard function estimation to account for maintenance effects. The processing system adjusts hazard parameters based on maintenance history and timing, allowing the model to dynamically reflect the reduced failure risk following maintenance activities while maintaining accurate predictions throughout the asset lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4687082A1Method and processing system for an asset state prediction
Publication Date: 2026.02.04 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • EP4687082A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4687082A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4687082A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

To perform an asset state prediction for an electric power system (11, 20), a processing system (30) is operative to estimate a hazard function that is indicative of a probability of asset failure as a function of a variable in absence of asset maintenance. The processing system (30) is operative to determine a hazard function parameter value for at least one hazard function parameter of the hazard function based on outage data for the electric power system (11, 20).