Hazard Zone Sensor Restart Using Valid Exit Movement Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety systems for protecting danger areas in plants require manual intervention for restarting after shutdown, which is inconvenient and can lead to system manipulation risks, and lack automated restart functionality based on valid movement sequences.

Innovation Solution

A sensor arrangement that detects object intrusion and shutdown, and upon recognizing a valid movement sequence for exit, generates a release signal for automatic system restart, ensuring increased security and eliminating manual actuation requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual actuating element is used for system restart, then system security is maintained through human verification, but operational convenience deteriorates requiring personnel to physically approach the danger zone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidoperational convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification through automatic detection of valid exit movement sequences by the sensor arrangement, eliminating the need for manual verification while maintaining security. The system serves itself by automatically detecting when the hazard zone is clear and initiating restart procedures without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical actuating element (button or rope) is replaced by an automated sensor-based detection system. The sensor arrangement uses optical or other detection fields to monitor the protective zone and automatically determines when safe restart conditions exist, substituting mechanical human verification with automated field-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automated restart functionality is implemented, then operational convenience is improved by eliminating manual intervention, but device complexity increases requiring advanced sensor arrangements and movement sequence detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational convenienceVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor arrangement is designed to perform multiple functions: it continuously monitors the protective zone for intrusion detection (safety function) and simultaneously tracks object movement patterns to detect valid exit sequences (restart function). This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its operational mode based on detected conditions. The sensor arrangement transitions from simple intrusion detection to complex movement sequence analysis only when appropriate, and the control system adapts its behavior based on the detected movement patterns, reducing unnecessary complexity while maintaining automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If movement sequence validation is implemented, then manipulation risks are reduced through automated verification, but measurement precision requirements increase to accurately detect and validate specific movement patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation risk reductionVSAvoidmovement detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-defines valid movement sequences that represent safe exit patterns from the protective zone. These sequences are established in advance based on safety requirements, and the sensor arrangement compares detected movements against these pre-established patterns, reducing the need for complex real-time analysis while maintaining precision through predetermined validation criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3575666B1Device for protecting a hazardous area of a system
Publication Date: 2022.07.13 LEUZE ELECTRONIC GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3575666B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3575666B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3575666B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a device (1) for safeguarding a hazardous area (2) of a system controlled by a controller (7). A sensor arrangement monitors a protective area (3) adapted to the hazardous area (2). When an object entering the protective area is detected, the sensor arrangement generates a switching signal that shuts down any hazardous operation of the system. The sensor arrangement also detects the object's movement as it leaves the protective area (3). Upon registering a valid movement sequence, the sensor arrangement generates a release signal that reactivates the hazardous operation of the system.