Vertical Spindle Hazel Crown for Yield and Light

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The yield of hazel trees in intensive cultivation is influenced by various factors, including cultivation form of the crown, which affects firmness, light usability, production space, mechanization, uniformity, and longevity of yield, and existing forms either lead to reduced yield over time or require extensive manual labor.

Innovation Solution

The cultivation form features a hazel tree with a crown in the shape of a vertical cylinder or spindle, supported by wire-ties, allowing for efficient use of space and mechanization, with branches cut to maintain a uniform cross-section and stability, enabling high-yield production on both small and large areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If hazel tree is cultivated in bush form with simple structure, then ease of operation and manual cultivation is improved, but yield in later years deteriorates due to reduced productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manual cultivationVSAvoidyield in later years
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The crown is segmented into multiple levels with primary branches at different heights (first level at 0.5-1.0m, second level at 1.0-1.5m, third level at 1.5-2.0m), allowing differentiated cultivation operations for each level while maintaining overall structural integrity for sustained productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cultivation form transitions from two-dimensional bush structure to three-dimensional multi-level crown structure, utilizing vertical space to increase yielding surface area and maintain productivity over longer periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If hazel tree is cultivated with trunk and vase-shaped crown, then productivity and yielding area are improved, but device complexity and mechanization difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield per unit areaVSAvoidcomplexity of mechanization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The crown is divided into three distinct height levels with specific branch arrangements, creating standardized segments that facilitate mechanized operations while maintaining high yielding surface area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating a wide vase-shaped crown at ground level, the invention inverts the approach by developing a tall narrow crown structure where branches are arranged at multiple heights, achieving productivity through vertical utilization rather than horizontal spread

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Illumination intensity

If branches are cut to maintain uniform cross-section, then crown form and light penetration are improved, but loss of time and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight penetration in crownVSAvoidtime for crown maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The crown structure is preliminarily formed with branches positioned at specific heights and angles during initial cultivation, creating a pre-configured framework that maintains light penetration without requiring frequent subsequent cutting operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Crown maintenance is performed periodically rather than continuously, with branches cut and repositioned at predetermined intervals to maintain uniform cross-section and light penetration while minimizing labor time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Strength

If lines are tied to support for stability, then firmness and structural strength are improved, but device complexity and support requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirmness of crown skeletonVSAvoidcomplexity of support system
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Support ties are applied locally at specific positions where structural weakness occurs, rather than uniformly across the entire crown, providing targeted reinforcement to critical areas while minimizing support system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The crown maintains a uniform cross-sectional form throughout its height, creating a cylindrical or spindle shape that provides inherent structural strength and stability without requiring extensive external support systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP2506703B1Cultivation of hazel tree with the crown having the form of vertical spindle on the support
Publication Date: 2017.09.13 MOULIS VLADO
  • EP2506703B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2506703B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Cultivation of hazel tree with the crown having the form of vertical spindle on the support represents the new way of planting and intensive cultivation of a hazel tree. Figure 3 shows the plantation cultivation of hazel tree in double rows, which basic trees in the yield period have crowns in form of vertical cylinder or spindle shown in Figure 1. A skeleton of the basic tree consists of a central line (1) without trunk, having on it radially arranged primary branches (2) and yielding branches (3). During the whole life of a basic tree there is done cutting of branches and forming the crown on the line that may grow up to 3 or 5 meters and external diameter of the spindle of a crown may be from 0,5 up to 1 meter. Because of poor firmness of a skeleton, basic trees are by means of lines (1) leant against supports (6). Such a form of hazel tree cultivation enables control of yielding potential in all parts of cultivation form, good illumination and photosynthesis, high rationality factor, as well as regular and good yield of high quality products.