HBA Virtualization for Multi-Path IO Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional host device multi-pathing arrangements fail to efficiently manage high IO loads on physical HBAs due to unawareness of path state changes, leading to performance issues like lower IOPS, higher latency, and increased response time when physical HBAs become flaky.

Innovation Solution

Implementing HBA virtualization awareness by providing details of virtual and physical HBAs to multi-pathing software, allowing for dynamic path selection and load balancing decisions based on hierarchical configurations, where virtual HBAs associated with problematic physical HBAs are switched to standby mode to route IO operations through healthy paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple virtual HBAs are associated with the same physical HBA to handle diverse IO workloads, then the system can support more applications and virtual machines, but the physical HBA becomes overloaded and performance degrades when it fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for diverse IO workloadsVSAvoidphysical HBA performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monolithic physical HBA into multiple virtual HBAs (vHBA1, vHBA2, etc.), each capable of handling specific IO workloads independently. This segmentation allows the system to support diverse applications while isolating failures to individual virtual HBAs rather than affecting the entire physical HBA, thus resolving the contradiction between versatility and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects which virtual HBA to use for each IO operation based on current system conditions and workload requirements. The multi-pathing software can dynamically switch between different vHBAs associated with the same physical HBA, enabling adaptive load distribution and failure recovery, which resolves the static overload problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If conventional multi-pathing routes IO operations through virtual HBAs without awareness of physical HBA status, then path selection is simplified, but performance degrades when physical HBAs become flaky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-pathing configurationVSAvoidIO operation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the multi-pathing software continuously monitors the status of physical HBAs and adjusts path selection accordingly. When a physical HBA becomes flaky or fails, the system receives feedback about its degraded status and automatically routes IO operations through alternative virtual HBAs or paths, maintaining productivity while keeping the configuration simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-pathing software acts as an intermediary layer between the host device and the physical HBAs, managing the complexity of physical HBA status monitoring and path selection. This intermediary absorbs the complexity of reliability management, allowing simple configuration while maintaining high productivity through intelligent path selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a single physical HBA handles high IO loads from multiple virtual HBAs, then hardware resources are consolidated and cost is reduced, but the system becomes a single point of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical HBA configurationVSAvoidsystem availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting a single physical HBA into multiple virtual HBAs with independent path management, the system maintains hardware consolidation (low device complexity) while creating logical independence that eliminates single points of failure (high reliability). Each virtual HBA can fail independently without taking down the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The single physical HBA is made multi-functional by associating it with multiple virtual HBAs that can serve different applications and workloads. This universality allows one physical device to perform multiple functions while maintaining reliability through virtualization and multi-pathing, resolving the contradiction between consolidation and availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11630581B2Host bus adaptor (HBA) virtualization awareness for effective input-output load balancing
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US11630581B2 patent drawing
  • US11630581B2 patent drawing
  • US11630581B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprises at least one processing device that is configured to control delivery of input-output operations from a host device to a storage system over selected ones of a plurality of paths through a network. The at least one processing device is further configured to detect a reduction in performance of one or more of the input-output operations over one or more paths of the plurality of paths, to identify a physical initiator component corresponding to the one or more paths, and to notify the storage system about the reduction in performance and the identified physical initiator component. The at least one processing device is also configured to receive a notification from the storage system indicating one or more virtual initiator instances of a plurality of virtual initiator instances corresponding to the identified physical initiator component, and to deactivate the one or more virtual initiator instances.