Emission Control System Using HBr for Mercury Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating mercury-contaminated gases in flue gases from coal combustion are inefficient in removing mercury, with existing technologies failing to effectively oxidize elemental mercury (Hg0) and capture it without re-emission, especially in systems with high chlorine content and varying temperature conditions.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a hydrogen halide, such as HBr, into the mercury-contaminated gas stream to create a doped particulate matter that coats filtration media, allowing for the removal of mercury through electrostatic forces and oxidation of Hg0 to Hg2+, which binds with fly ash, thereby reducing mercury emissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional methods are used to treat mercury-contaminated gas, then the system structure remains simple, but mercury removal efficiency is low and re-emission occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces HBr as an intermediary substance that facilitates mercury oxidation and capture. HBr acts as a mediator between the flue gas and the filtration system, enabling effective mercury removal without requiring fundamental changes to the existing electrostatic precipitator structure. This resolves the contradiction by adding a chemical intermediary rather than complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the flue gas by injecting HBr, which alters the oxidation state of mercury from elemental (Hg0) to oxidized forms (Hg2+). This parameter change enables the existing filtration system to capture mercury effectively, improving removal efficiency without increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If HBr injection is used to oxidize Hg0, then mercury oxidation efficiency improves, but the system becomes more complex and requires additional injection equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury oxidation efficiencyVSAvoidinjection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs HBr injection that leverages the existing thermal energy and flow conditions of the flue gas to achieve spontaneous oxidation of mercury. The system uses the natural characteristics of the flue gas stream to facilitate the chemical reaction, reducing the need for additional heating or pressurization equipment and minimizing overall system complexity while maintaining high oxidation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If filtration media is coated with doped particulate matter, then mercury capture effectiveness increases, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury capture effectivenessVSAvoidfiltration media preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies doped particulate matter to the filtration media in advance, creating a pre-conditioned surface that is optimized for mercury capture. This preliminary coating action ensures that when flue gas passes through the filter, mercury is immediately captured by the bromine-containing particulate layer, enhancing capture effectiveness without requiring complex real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If electrostatic forces are used to remove doped particulate matter, then mercury removal efficiency improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury removal efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical collection methods with electrostatic forces for removing doped particulate matter containing mercury. The electrostatic precipitation process uses electric fields to attract and collect charged particles, achieving high removal efficiency with lower energy consumption compared to mechanical filtration or centrifugal separation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves greater than 50% mercury removal and maintains effectiveness across varying temperature conditions, with residual effects lasting beyond the initial HBr injection period, demonstrating improved mercury control and reduced re-emission.

Implementation Method 1

oxidation of Hg0 to Hg2+

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

binds with fly ash

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

removing greater than 50% of the doped particulate matter from the mercury contaminated gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic precipitation: Electrostatic Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS9555369B2Emission control system
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 APTIM GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US9555369B2 patent drawing
  • US9555369B2 patent drawing
  • US9555369B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of treating mercury contaminated gas comprising: introducing a hydrogen halide selected from HBr and HI into a mercury contaminated gas stream containing a quantity of particulate matter at an introduction rate sufficient to create a concentration of at least 0.1 ppmvd; wherein greater than 50% of all particulate matter in the mercury contaminated gas stream is a native particulate matter; contacting a quantity of active bromine with the native particulate matter; creating a doped particulate matter; coating a filtration media with the doped particulate matter; and passing a portion of the mercury contaminated gas stream through the doped particulate matter on the filtration media and other related methods are disclosed herein.