H-Bridge Transistor Current Limiting via Phased Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 'H-bridge' circuits, the simultaneous turning off of all transistors during overcurrent events leads to substrate injection and increased supply voltage, necessitating costly semiconductor processes and larger decoupling capacitances.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects failures in individual transistors, turns off the affected transistor, and waits for discharge of accumulated output power before turning off the others, thereby reducing freewheeling diode injection and overshoot in supply voltage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all transistors are turned off simultaneously during overcurrent events, then protection against overcurrent is achieved, but substrate injection and increased supply voltage occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercurrent protectionVSAvoidsubstrate injection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transistor shutdown process into two distinct phases: first shutting off the affected transistor immediately for protection, then shutting off opposite transistors only after the inductive discharge phase completes. This segmentation in time prevents simultaneous shutdown of all transistors, thereby eliminating substrate injection while maintaining overcurrent protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary detection of the inductive discharge phase completion before shutting off the opposite transistors. By detecting when the freewheeling current has decayed to a safe level, the system prepares the shutdown sequence in advance to avoid substrate injection and supply voltage spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If all transistors are turned off simultaneously during overcurrent events, then protection against overcurrent is achieved, but decoupling capacitances must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercurrent protectionVSAvoiddecoupling capacitances
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the transistor shutdown into sequential phases rather than simultaneous action. By delaying the shutdown of opposite transistors until after the inductive discharge phase, the method prevents supply voltage overshoot that would otherwise require larger decoupling capacitances to compensate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the timing parameter of transistor shutdown from simultaneous to sequential. This parameter change in the shutdown sequence eliminates the need for increased decoupling capacitance values, as the supply voltage remains stable throughout the phased shutdown process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If freewheeling diodes are used for inductive discharge, then overcurrent protection is achieved, but freewheeling diode injection occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovercurrent protectionVSAvoidfreewheeling diode injection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary detection of the inductive discharge phase completion before proceeding to the next shutdown step. This preliminary action allows the system to wait for the freewheeling current to naturally decay through the diode, preventing substrate injection while still utilizing the diode's protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful inductive discharge phase into a beneficial waiting period. By utilizing the natural decay of current through the freewheeling diode as a signal to delay the next shutdown action, the method transforms what could be a source of substrate injection into a protective timing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS10326265B2Method for limiting the current in devices of “H-bridge” type
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO KG
  • US10326265B2 patent drawing
  • US10326265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for limiting the current in a device of “H-bridge” type having a plurality of transistors including the following steps: detection of a failure in a transistor from among the plurality of transistors; disabling of the transistor in which a failure has been detected; detection in the transistors opposite to the transistor, of the discharging of the energy accumulated at output; and disabling of the other transistors of the plurality of transistors. A system for limiting the current in a device of “H-bridge” type having a plurality of transistors is also disclosed.