HCC Lesion Characterization via Automated Image Registration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accurate processing of liver images during multi-phasic CT exams is challenging due to complex backgrounds, breathing movements, ambiguous tumor boundaries, and varied tumor shapes, leading to variability and misdiagnosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection and treatment evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A workflow combining image processing and deep learning methods to segment and characterize HCC lesions, including registration of images, segmentation of liver and lesions, and sub-segmentation to determine LI-RADS features and treatment response, reducing subjectivity and inter-physician variability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual comparison of grayscale values is used to assess treatment response, then physician expertise can be applied, but variability and misdiagnosis occur due to complex backgrounds and ambiguous boundaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment response assessment accuracyVSAvoidinter-physician variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the liver tumor into distinct regions (enhancing vs. non-enhancing areas) using image processing algorithms. This automatic segmentation eliminates manual boundary drawing variability between physicians while precisely identifying treatment response areas, directly resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (automated image analysis software with LI-RADS criteria implementation) that mediates between the complex medical images and the physician's assessment. This intermediary objectively processes grayscale values and enhances/changing area calculations, removing human subjectivity while maintaining expert-level assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If detailed manual analysis of each phase image is performed, then comprehensive evaluation is achieved, but time consumption and mental burden on physicians increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelesion characterization accuracyVSAvoidtreatment evaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary automated processing of all four CT phases before physician review. The system pre-calculates enhancing/non-enhancing area ratios, detects changes between phases, and generates preliminary LI-RADS classifications. This preliminary action provides comprehensive evaluation data instantly, eliminating time-consuming manual analysis while maintaining diagnostic precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the analysis of all four CT phases (arterial, portal, delayed, and hepatobiliary phases) into a single integrated assessment. The system combines enhancement patterns across all phases to determine LI-RADS classification, providing comprehensive lesion characterization in one unified process rather than requiring separate manual evaluation of each phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If automated image processing is implemented, then efficiency and consistency are improved, but handling of complex backgrounds and varied tumor shapes becomes challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing efficiencyVSAvoidtumor boundary detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by implementing adaptive thresholding and contrast enhancement algorithms that automatically adjust to different tumor types, sizes, and backgrounds. The system modifies imaging parameters dynamically based on detected features, enabling efficient automated processing while maintaining accurate boundary detection across varied tumor presentations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11227683B2Methods and systems for characterizing anatomical features in medical images
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US11227683B2 patent drawing
  • US11227683B2 patent drawing
  • US11227683B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods and systems are provided for determining and characterizing features of an anatomical structure from a medical image. In one example, a method comprises acquiring a plurality of medical images over time during an exam, registering the segmented anatomical structure between the plurality of medical images, segmenting an anatomical structure in a one of the plurality of medical images after registering the plurality of medical images, creating and characterizing a reference region of interest (ROI) in each of the plurality of medical images, determining characteristics of the anatomical structure by tracking pixel values of the segmented and registered anatomical structure over time, and outputting the determined characteristics on a display device.