HCFC-123a Dehydrochlorination Catalyst Selectivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing process for manufacturing chlorotrifluoroethylene (CFO-1113) from 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a) suffers from low yield and efficiency due to the formation of undesirable by-products like trans- and cis-isomers of 1,2-dichloro-1,2-difluoroethylene, which complicates product separation and increases costs.

Innovation Solution

Dehydrochlorinating HCFC-123a in the presence of catalysts such as metal halides, halogenated metal oxides, or zero-valent metals/metal alloys at elevated temperatures to selectively produce CFO-1113, with catalysts like MgF2/CsCl, fluorinated MgO, or Pd/MgO, achieving high conversion and selectivity while minimizing by-product formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dehydrochlorination is performed in the presence of certain vapor phase catalysts, then the conversion of HCFC-123a to CFO-1113 is improved, but the formation of by-products such as trans- and/or cis-isomers of 1,2-dichloro-1,2-difluoroethylene (CFO-1112) increases via competing dehydrofluorination reaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion of HCFC-123a to CFO-1113VSAvoidformation of CFO-1112 by-products
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the catalyst composition (specific ratios of metal halides, halogenated metal oxides, or zero-valent metals supported on carriers), temperature range (300-600°C), and pressure conditions to favor dehydrochlorination over dehydrofluorination. By carefully controlling these parameters, the process achieves high conversion of HCFC-123a while minimizing CFO-1112 by-product formation through the competing dehydrofluorination reaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by employing specific catalyst systems that act as mediators between HCFC-123a and the desired product CFO-1113. The catalysts (metal halides, halogenated metal oxides, or zero-valent metals on carriers) selectively facilitate the dehydrochlorination pathway while suppressing the dehydrofluorination pathway, thereby controlling the reaction selectivity and reducing harmful by-product formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If dehydrochlorination is performed to increase productivity, then the yield of CFO-1113 is improved, but the process efficiency is reduced due to additional requirements for product separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of CFO-1113VSAvoidproduct separation requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing reaction conditions (temperature, pressure, catalyst composition, contact time) to maximize selectivity toward CFO-1113 and minimize by-product formation. By carefully controlling these parameters, the process achieves high productivity with a clean product profile that reduces the complexity and cost of downstream separation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of by-product formation into a benefit by using specific catalyst systems and reaction conditions that actually suppress by-product formation while enhancing main product yield. The careful selection of catalysts and optimization of parameters transforms what could be a problematic side reaction into a controlled process that favors the desired product, thereby simplifying separation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a high conversion percentage of HCFC-123a to CFO-1113 with selectivity exceeding 90%, reducing by-product impurities to less than 5% and enhancing productivity, thereby improving the overall efficiency and yield of the desired fluorinated olefin.

Implementation Method 1

dehydrochlorinating 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a) in the presence of a catalyst selected from the group consisting of (i) one or more metal halides; (ii) one or more halogenated metal oxides; (iii) one or more zero-valent metals or metal alloys

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Dehydrochlorinating HCFC-123a in the presence of catalysts such as metal halides, halogenated metal oxides, or zero-valent metals/metal alloys at elevated temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3189025B1Process for producing chlorotrifluoroethylene
Publication Date: 2021.01.06 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3189025B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates, at least in part, to a process for making chlorotrifluoroethylene (CFO-1113) from 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a). In certain aspects, the process includes dehydrochlorinating 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a) in the presence of a catalyst selected from the group consisting of (i) one or more metal halides; (ii) one or more halogenated metal oxides; (iii) one or more zero-valent metals or metal alloys; (iv) combinations thereof.