HDMX Modulating Agents for p53 Activity in Cancer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer therapies targeting p53 activity through HDM2 inhibitors face resistance due to co-expression of HDMX, which reduces efficacy, and there is a need for improved methods to increase p53 activity in cancer cells.

Innovation Solution

The use of HDMX modulating agents, such as cross-linked peptides like SAH-p53-8, that bind with high affinity to HDMX, either alone or in combination with HDM2 modulating agents like Nutlin-3, to increase p53 activity in cancer cells, thereby enhancing therapeutic outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If HDM2 inhibitors are used to increase p53 activity, then p53 activity is improved in certain tumors, but efficacy is reduced in tumors where HDMX is co-expressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtumor type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the HDM2/HDMX inhibition function into two separate agents: an HDM2-binding agent (e.g., Nutlin-3) and an HDMX-binding agent (e.g., stapled peptide). This segmentation allows each agent to specifically target its respective protein, enabling the treatment to be effective across different tumor types regardless of whether HDM2, HDMX, or both are overexpressed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the functionality of HDM2 and HDMX inhibition into a single combination therapy regimen. By administering both HDM2-binding and HDMX-binding agents together, the treatment overcomes the limitation of single-agent therapy that fails in tumors with HDMX co-expression, thereby achieving broad-spectrum efficacy across multiple tumor types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If HDMX modulating agents are used to increase p53 activity, then therapeutic efficacy is improved in HDMX-expressing tumors, but treatment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtreatment regimen complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combination therapy regimen serves multiple functions: it effectively treats tumors overexpressing HDM2, tumors overexpressing HDMX, and tumors co-expressing both proteins. This multi-functionality justifies the increased treatment complexity by providing a universal solution that works across different molecular subtypes of cancer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the treatment parameter from monotherapy to combination therapy, adjusting the complexity level to achieve superior therapeutic outcomes. The increased complexity is parameterically justified by the significant improvement in response rates and survival benefits observed in clinical trials across diverse tumor types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If combination therapy with HDM2 and HDMX modulating agents is used, then p53 activity is significantly increased, but cost and treatment burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvep53 activation efficacyVSAvoidnumber of agents administered
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The combination therapy preemptively addresses the potential resistance mechanism caused by HDMX overexpression before it can compromise treatment efficacy. By including both HDM2 and HDMX inhibitors from the outset, the treatment prevents treatment failure in tumors that would otherwise be resistant to HDM2 inhibitor monotherapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary molecular characterization of tumors to identify HDM2 and HDMX expression status before initiating combination therapy. This preliminary action allows for optimized patient selection and dosing strategies, ensuring that patients receive the full benefit of combination therapy while minimizing unnecessary treatment burden for those who would respond to monotherapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10822374B2Cancer therapies and diagnostics
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC
  • US10822374B2 patent drawing
  • US10822374B2 patent drawing
  • US10822374B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compositions and methods for increasing p53-dependent transcriptional activity in a cell.