HDR Video Luminance Mapping for Adaptive Display Contrast

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing HDR video coding technologies struggle to optimally adapt image pixel luminances for different display capabilities, particularly when transitioning from high dynamic range (HDR) to standard dynamic range (SDR), without considering the impact of ambient lighting and minimum displayable luminance.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for adapting HDR video pixel luminances using a luminance mapping function to convert between HDR and SDR formats, incorporating display adaptation algorithms that consider both maximum and minimum luminance capabilities of the display.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If HDR video is converted to SDR using traditional luminance mapping, then compatibility with standard displays is improved, but image quality and contrast are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay compatibilityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies tone mapping before luminance mapping to pre-process the HDR image data. This preliminary action preserves luminance relationships and contrast information before the conversion to SDR, preventing the quality loss that occurs when mapping is applied directly to raw HDR data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate processed image as a mediator between the original HDR image and the final SDR output. This intermediate representation maintains the luminance structure of HDR while being prepared for SDR conversion, allowing quality preservation during the transition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Illumination intensity

If maximum luminance is increased for HDR displays, then dynamic range is improved, but adaptability to different viewing environments is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaximum luminanceVSAvoidviewing environment adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by allowing the luminance mapping parameters to change based on detected ambient lighting conditions. The system dynamically adjusts the mapping function to optimize image appearance for the current viewing environment while maintaining HDR quality on capable displays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the luminance mapping parameters based on ambient light detection. By adjusting mapping parameters rather than fixed conversion, the system adapts to different viewing conditions (bright, dim, HDR-capable) while preserving image quality and contrast across environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If simple luminance mapping is used for HDR to SDR conversion, then processing complexity is reduced, but contrast and image fidelity are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing complexityVSAvoidcontrast fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies tone mapping as a preliminary processing step before luminance mapping. This pre-processing organizes the luminance data in a way that preserves contrast relationships, allowing subsequent mapping to maintain fidelity without requiring excessively complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12462359B2Display-optimized HDR video contrast adaptation
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US12462359B2 patent drawing
  • US12462359B2 patent drawing
  • US12462359B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention creates improved images for various viewing environment light levels. The invention process an input image with an input luminance dynamic range with an input maximum luminance using a processing system. The input image has metadata which specifies a reference luminance mapping function. The output image has an adjusted maximum luminance determined by subtracting a user correction value from an output maximum luminance. The luminances of the input image are processed using an adapted luminance mapping function. The adapted luminance mapping function is based on the adjusted maximum luminance value and the reference luminance mapping function.