Homomorphic Encryption Debugging via Hybrid Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Debugging in Homomorphic Encryption (HE) space is inefficient due to the encryption of intermediate results, making it impractical to find and resolve code flaws or 'bugs' using standard Integrated Development Environment (IDE) tools, as debugging processes that would take milliseconds in plaintext space can take minutes to hours in HE space.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid encrypted-unencrypted debugging environment is provided, where a HE program is translated into an equivalent unencrypted program, allowing debugging primarily in plaintext space with validation against a minority sampling in HE space to ensure accuracy, significantly increasing debugging speed and reducing complexity by executing most code in unencrypted space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If debugging is performed in homomorphic encryption space, then data privacy and security are maintained, but debugging speed and efficiency deteriorate significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacyVSAvoiddebugging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The debugging process is segmented into two distinct phases: a simulation mode phase for rapid debugging in plaintext, and a validation mode phase for verifying results in encrypted space. This segmentation allows the system to optimize for speed during debugging while maintaining security during validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simulated version of the encrypted computation environment that replicates the behavior of homomorphic encryption operations using plaintext. This copy allows debugging without actually executing encrypted operations, thereby maintaining privacy during validation while enabling fast debugging in simulation mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If standard IDE tools are used for debugging encrypted programs, then developer convenience is maintained, but debugging capability becomes ineffective due to encrypted intermediate results

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIDE compatibilityVSAvoidbug detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation mode acts as an intermediary layer between the developer and the encrypted computation. It translates encrypted operations into equivalent plaintext simulations, allowing standard IDE tools to function effectively during debugging while maintaining the ability to validate results in the encrypted environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If complete debugging in HE space is performed, then result accuracy is ensured, but time consumption increases from minutes to hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresult accuracyVSAvoiddebugging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial debugging action by executing simulations in plaintext for rapid iteration, then applies validation only to critical portions or samples of the computation in encrypted space. This partial action approach maintains sufficient accuracy for most debugging needs while dramatically reducing time consumption compared to complete HE space debugging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11989113B2Efficiently debugging a program in homomorphically encrypted space
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 DUALITY TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11989113B2 patent drawing
  • US11989113B2 patent drawing
  • US11989113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device, system and method for debugging a homomorphically encrypted (HE) program. The HE program comprising real ciphertext data and encrypted operations in the HE space (production mode) may be mapped to an equivalent plaintext program comprising equivalent pseudo-ciphertext data and pseudo-encrypted operations in the unencrypted space (simulation mode). The plaintext program may be executed in a first full pass in simulation model and a sampling of the HE program may be executed in a second partial pass in production mode, the results of which are compared. The HE program and/or mapping may be validated if the results of simulation and production mode match and debugged if the results do not match. An integrated development environment (IDE) may switch among the HE space (production mode), the unencrypted space (simulation mode), and a combination of both HE and unencrypted spaces simultaneously (simultaneous production-simulation mode).