HE-SIGB RU Parameter Extraction for DL-OFDMA

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In DL-OFDMA and DL-MUMIMO communications, existing systems face inefficiencies in processing HE-SIGB symbols, requiring significant hardware resources and time to store and multiplex RU parameters, especially when dealing with multiple RUs and large channel bandwidths.

Innovation Solution

A system that parses HE-SIGB symbols by using a receiver with control circuitry to determine RU sizes and tones allocated, incrementing a counter for non-dedicated RUs and storing parameters for dedicated RUs, allowing for efficient extraction of intended RU parameters without storing all RU parameters and reducing computational complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the receiver stores all RU parameters and uses multiplexing operations to identify intended parameters, then the receiver can obtain RU parameters for all RUs, but the hardware area and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRU parameter identification accuracyVSAvoidhardware area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary RU parameters needed for the specific receiver instead of storing all RU parameters. The system identifies and extracts only the parameters relevant to the intended receiver, eliminating the need for large storage buffers and complex multiplexing operations while maintaining accurate parameter identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the RU parameter processing into distinct stages: receiving the HE-SIGB symbol, determining RU sizes from mapping tables, decoding user blocks, identifying the intended receiver, and extracting only the necessary parameters. This segmentation allows the system to process parameters efficiently without storing all parameters simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the receiver stores all RU parameters and performs multiplexing operations, then complete RU parameter information is available, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRU parameter completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by determining RU sizes from mapping tables and decoding user blocks before identifying the intended receiver. This allows the system to prepare parameter extraction in advance, reducing the time needed for actual parameter identification and extraction when processing is required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the specific RU parameters needed by the intended receiver from the decoded user blocks, rather than storing and processing all parameters. This extraction approach significantly reduces processing time while maintaining parameter completeness for the intended receiver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If large multiplexers are used to identify intended RU parameters, then parameter identification is possible, but hardware area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter identification capabilityVSAvoidhardware area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for large multiplexers by extracting only the necessary RU parameters directly from the decoded user blocks. The system identifies the intended receiver and extracts parameters through direct access rather than multiplexing operations, significantly reducing hardware area while maintaining full parameter identification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified copy of the parameter extraction process that directly accesses needed parameters from decoded blocks without requiring complex multiplexer hardware. This virtual copying approach replaces physical multiplexer structures with software-based parameter selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11258555B1Flexible scheme for high efficiency SIGB processing
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US11258555B1 patent drawing
  • US11258555B1 patent drawing
  • US11258555B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein provide systems for processing high efficiency SIGB (HE-SIGB) symbols and extracting resource unit (RU) information in down link orthogonal frequency division multiple access (DL-OFDMA) and multi-user multiple input multiple output (DL-MUMIMO) communication. An HE-SIGB symbol is processed based on an RU size mapping table. An RU counter is used to process entries in the RU size mapping table and determine the RU size and starting tone index of the intended RU. The RU parameters extracted from the HE-SIGB symbol are used to decode data symbols in the DL-OFDMA or DL-MUMIMO packet. Pilot tone indices of the intended User block and adjacent pilot tone indices are determined for improved carrier phase error estimation.