Interleaver for HE WLAN PPDU Subchannel Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current WLAN technologies face limitations in supporting Multi-User Multiple Input Multiple Output (MU-MIMO) and Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) efficiently within the High Efficiency WLAN Physical layer Protocol Data Unit (HE PPDU), particularly in managing subchannel allocation and interleaving processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a new interleaver and deinterleaver method that allocates subchannels efficiently to multiple Stations (STAs) in a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN), allowing for the generation and transmission of interleaved data units based on subchannel characteristics, and the reception of deinterleaved data units by STAs, utilizing a baseband processor and RF transceiver to manage PPDU frames across multiple subchannels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional interleaving methods are used in HE PPDU, then the structure is simple, but the ability to support MU-MIMO and OFDMA efficiently is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for MU-MIMO and OFDMAVSAvoidinterleaver structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interleaver is divided into multiple independent interleavers, with each interleaver corresponding to a specific subchannel. This segmentation allows each interleaver to be optimized for its specific subchannel characteristics while maintaining overall system simplicity. The baseband processor controls multiple interleavers separately, enabling efficient MU-MIMO and OFDMA support without requiring a completely complex unified structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interleaver configuration is made dynamic through baseband processor control, where interleaving parameters can be adjusted based on subchannel characteristics and transmission requirements. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the system to adapt to different MU-MIMO and OFDMA scenarios without requiring a fixed complex structure, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If subchannels are allocated to multiple STAs, then the system throughput increases, but the management complexity of interleaving processes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem throughputVSAvoidinterleaving management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interleaving management is segmented by assigning dedicated interleavers to specific subchannels. Each STA receives subchannels with corresponding dedicated interleavers, allowing independent management of interleaving processes for each STA. This segmentation reduces the management complexity compared to a unified approach, while still enabling high system throughput through parallel processing across multiple subchannels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The baseband processor acts as an intermediary that controls and coordinates the multiple interleavers. By centralizing the control function in the baseband processor, the system can manage the complexity of multiple interleaving processes systematically. The baseband processor handles the coordination and parameter management, allowing the throughput benefit of multi-STA operation without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If data units are interleaved based on subchannel characteristics, then the transmission reliability improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interleaving process is segmented into parallel operations, with each subchannel having its own dedicated interleaver that processes data independently. This parallel processing approach maintains transmission reliability through characteristic-based interleaving while reducing overall processing time compared to sequential processing. Multiple data units can be interleaved simultaneously across different subchannels, achieving both reliability improvement and time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interleaving parameters and configurations are prepared in advance based on subchannel characteristics before the actual data transmission. By pre-configuring the interleavers with appropriate parameters for each subchannel, the system reduces the processing time during actual data transmission while maintaining the reliability benefits of characteristic-based interleaving. This preliminary preparation allows for faster execution without compromising the reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9532187B2Interleaver for physical layer protocol data unit in a high efficiency wireless LAN
Publication Date: 2016.12.27 ATLAS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9532187B2 patent drawing
  • US9532187B2 patent drawing
  • US9532187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for transmitting using an interleaver applied to a PPDU in a HE WLAN. In an aspect of the present invention, a method for transmitting data to a plurality of STAs through transmission channel by an AP in a WLAN system, wherein the transmission channel is divided into a plurality of subchannels which are allocated to the plurality of STAs respectively, the method may include interleaving a plurality of data units for the plurality of STAs based on characteristics of the plurality of subchannels allocated to the plurality of STAs to generate a plurality of interleaved data units; and transmitting, through the transmission channel, a Physical layer Protocol Data Unit (PPDU) frame including the plurality of interleaved data units respectively on the plurality of subchannels to the plurality of STAs.