Vehicle Head Restraint Locking Device with Friction and Positive Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locking devices for vehicle head restraints often produce noise and increase wear during adjustment, and may not provide optimal safety in accident scenarios due to inadequate locking mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A locking device with a combination of blocking and sliding mechanisms, utilizing oblique surfaces and springs to facilitate smooth, noise-reduced adjustments while ensuring safety, featuring predominantly frictional and positive locking means that engage based on load conditions, and incorporating a blocking pin for enhanced security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a bolt and toothed portion are used for locking with positive engagement, then reliable locking is achieved, but noise is generated during adjustment and wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidnoise and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into two distinct subsystems: a frictional locking means for normal operation and a positive locking means for secure positioning. This segmentation allows each subsystem to perform its specialized function optimally - the frictional mechanism provides smooth, quiet adjustment while the positive mechanism ensures reliable locking without noise during adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism transitions dynamically between two states based on operational requirements. During normal adjustment, the frictional locking engages to allow controlled movement. When secure positioning is needed, the positive locking engages to prevent movement. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction by providing both smooth adjustment and reliable locking without the harmful effects of each other

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the bolt is lifted counter to spring force for release, then adjustment is enabled, but increased wear occurs on the bolt and toothed portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment capabilityVSAvoidwear on components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional mechanical lifting mechanism is replaced with a friction-based release system. Instead of lifting the bolt against spring force, the user simply overcomes the frictional resistance by applying force in the adjustment direction. This substitution eliminates the wear-causing lifting action while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism changes the friction parameter dynamically - during normal operation, friction provides stable positioning; during adjustment, the friction is overcome by applied force. This parameter change allows easy adjustment without the wear associated with traditional spring-loaded lifting mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-generated harmful factors

If predominantly frictional locking is used for smooth adjustment, then noise is reduced, but locking reliability under high load decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidlocking reliability under load
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is divided into two functional segments: a frictional locking means for noise-free adjustment and a positive locking means for load-bearing security. This segmentation allows the frictional component to handle low-load adjustment operations quietly while the positive locking component handles high-load scenarios reliably

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between frictional and positive locking modes based on load conditions. Under normal operating loads, the frictional locking provides smooth, quiet operation. When loads exceed a certain threshold, the positive locking mechanism engages to maintain reliability, thus resolving the contradiction between noise reduction and locking reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a robust, reliable mechanism for adjusting head restraints with reduced noise and increased safety, ensuring secure positioning and comfort adjustments without excessive wear, and effectively engages locking mechanisms only under necessary loads.

Implementation Method 1

a spring (41) arranged between the first subsection (11) and the second subsection (12) in the direction of displacement C, which is acting on the first subsection (11) with a force in the direction of displacement C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the locking device comprises both predominantly positive and predominantly frictional locking means, for example the locking at base load or a lower operating load taking place predominantly frictionally and with an increased operating load predominantly positively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8915546B2Locking device, in particular for a crash-active head restraint of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2014.12.23 ADIENT US LLC
  • US8915546B2 patent drawing
  • US8915546B2 patent drawing
  • US8915546B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking device is disclosed, such as for head restraint of a vehicle seat. The head restraint has a first subsection that may be displaced from a first position in a direction of displacement into a comfort position. Relative movement of a second subsection relative to the first subsection and/or relative to a third subsection is provided about a rotational axis substantially parallel to the direction of displacement. A blocking device and a sliding device are arranged between the first and second subsections and/or between the second and third subsections.