Head Up CPR Device with Integrated Ventilation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CPR methods, especially out-of-hospital treatments, are inadequate in achieving high neurologically intact survival rates due to inefficiencies in blood flow to the brain and risks to responders, with conventional CPR providing less than 10% of pre-arrest cerebral perfusion pressures and exposing responders to unnecessary risks.

Innovation Solution

The development of comprehensive Head Up CPR systems that integrate chest compression devices, positive pressure ventilation, and intrathoracic pressure regulation, synchronized with CPR cycles, to enhance cerebral perfusion and reduce exposure risks through automated and controlled delivery of resuscitation efforts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional CPR and manual ventilation are used, then responders can provide basic life support, but cerebral perfusion pressure remains less than 10% of pre-arrest levels and survival rates are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvival rateVSAvoidcerebral perfusion pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple resuscitation functions (chest compression, active decompression, positive pressure ventilation, and head elevation) into a single integrated automated CPR device. This merging of functions allows the system to simultaneously optimize cerebral perfusion through coordinated action of all components, achieving reliable survival outcomes that exceed conventional CPR capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical CPR and ventilation with an automated mechanical system that delivers precisely controlled chest compressions, active decompressions, and synchronized positive pressure breaths. This substitution eliminates human error and ensures consistent delivery of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual CPR and ventilation are performed, then responders can treat patients, but responders are exposed to airborne disease transmission risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment capabilityVSAvoidairborne disease exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The automated CPR device replaces manual ventilation with an integrated positive pressure ventilation system that delivers breaths through a sealed interface. This eliminates the need for responders to maintain direct contact with the patient's airway, significantly reducing exposure to airborne pathogens while maintaining full treatment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a sealed ventilation interface and tubing system as an intermediary between the responder and patient airway. This intermediary allows ventilation to be delivered without direct responder contact with the patient's respiratory tract, protecting against airborne disease transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If conventional CPR is performed without active decompression, then chest compressions can be delivered, but incomplete chest wall recoil reduces ventilation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventilation efficiencyVSAvoidCPR mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges chest compression and active decompression functions into a single automated device with integrated mechanisms. The system uses a unified mechanical structure that performs both compression and active recoil phases, simplifying the overall system while improving ventilation efficiency compared to manual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces passive chest wall recoil with an active mechanical decompression system that actively pulls the chest wall outward after compression. This substitution ensures complete chest expansion and optimal ventilation efficiency through mechanically controlled decompression forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If positive pressure ventilation is delivered without synchronization, then ventilation can be provided, but hyperventilation and improper timing reduce survival outcomes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvival outcomeVSAvoidventilation control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated CPR device incorporates feedback mechanisms that detect the compression phase timing and use this information to synchronize positive pressure ventilation delivery. The system monitors compression cycles and automatically times ventilator breaths to occur during appropriate phases, eliminating hyperventilation and ensuring optimal survival outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual ventilation timing and control with an automated synchronization system that electronically coordinates breath delivery with compression phases. This substitution eliminates human error in ventilation timing and ensures consistent, optimal ventilation control for improved survival outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These systems significantly improve cerebral perfusion pressures, increase systemic and cerebral blood flow, and enhance survival rates by normalizing brain blood flow and reducing intracranial pressure, while also reducing the risk of airborne disease transmission for responders.

Implementation Method 1

elevate a patient's upper body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

chest compression device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

positive pressure ventilation system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure Gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20220265508A1Head up CPR device with integrated ventilator
Publication Date: 2022.08.25 RESUSCITATION INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US20220265508A1 patent drawing
  • US20220265508A1 patent drawing
  • US20220265508A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A head up CPR system may include a base and an upper support coupled with the base and configured to elevate a patient's upper body. The system may include a chest compression device that is coupleable with one or both of the base and the upper support and a positive pressure ventilation system that is coupleable with the base.