Headband Bow Latching for Universal Optical Instrument Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing headband apparatuses for optical instruments are not universally compatible, as they are designed for either left- or right-handers, and lack the ability to mount additional devices, leading to inefficiencies and increased production costs due to the need for separate versions and instability of the bow due to weight distribution.

Innovation Solution

A headband apparatus with fastening elements on both ends of the bow, allowing for a releasable latching device that can be mounted on either side, enabling universal use and the integration of additional elements like controllers or light sources, and stabilizing the bow through balanced support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the latching device is permanently mounted on the swivel axis of the bow, then the bow can be reliably latched in working or rest position, but separate headband apparatuses are required for left-handers and right-handers, increasing development and production outlay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching reliabilityVSAvoidproduct variety
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching device is designed with a universal mounting structure that can be attached to either side of the headband via interchangeable mounting plates. This allows a single latching device design to serve both left-handed and right-handed users, eliminating the need for separate headband apparatuses for different hand preferences while maintaining reliable latching functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting system is divided into separate modular components: mounting plates that can be attached to the headband and latching devices that can be mounted on these plates. This segmentation allows the latching device to be independently positioned on either side of the headband, providing versatility without requiring different fundamental device designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the latching device is arranged for right-handers, then the majority user group is served, but operating comfort is substantially impaired for left-handers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating comfortVSAvoidhand preference adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting plate system enables the latching device to be universally applied to both left and right sides of the headband. Users can select the appropriate mounting plate position based on their hand preference, ensuring optimal operating comfort for both left-handed and right-handed individuals without compromising adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the bow is held in the working position at only one end by the latching device, then the latching device structure is simplified, but the bow is inclined downward in the direction of the other end due to the weight of the ophthalmoscope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching device structureVSAvoidbow position stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting plates are designed with asymmetric weight distribution or counterbalancing features that compensate for the weight of the ophthalmoscope. By strategically positioning the mounting plates or incorporating counterweights, the system maintains bow stability in the horizontal working position without requiring complex latching mechanisms at both ends, thus balancing structural simplicity with position stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Adaptability or versatility

If fastening elements are provided on the headband for mounting additional elements, then the field of use is substantially expanded, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of useVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening elements are designed as universal mounting interfaces that can accommodate various additional elements such as light sources, controllers, or other optical instruments. By using standardized fastening mechanisms, the system expands its field of use without requiring different fastening structures for different attachments, thus managing device complexity while enhancing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The fastening elements are integrated into the existing mounting plate structure, allowing additional elements to be nested within or attached to the same framework. This nesting approach enables the headband apparatus to support multiple functions and additional components without proportionally increasing overall device complexity, as the fastening infrastructure is shared across different configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS7441282B2Headband apparatus for head-worn optical instruments
Publication Date: 2008.10.28 HEINE OPTOTECHNIK GMBH & CO KG
  • US7441282B2 patent drawing
  • US7441282B2 patent drawing
  • US7441282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A headband apparatus for head-worn optical instruments includes a headband (12) and a bow (16) on which the optical instrument is fitted, and which is fitted with both its ends (100) to the middle region of the headband (12) such that it can swivel about a swivel axis (S) between a working position and a rest position. Fastening elements (26, 28) for releasably fastening additional elements (38) are fitted on the headband (12).