Headbox Control for Paper Curl via Surface Anisotropy Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing paper and paperboard manufacturing processes face challenges in controlling curl, which can lead to undesirable deformations, jams in printing devices, incomplete adhesion in corrugated cardboard production, and reduced strength in cartons, due to the inability to timely and accurately measure anisotropy differences between surfaces during production.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that measures anisotropy on both surfaces of the sheet during production and adjusts the headbox operating parameters in real-time to minimize anisotropy differences, using sensors and a controller to monitor and control the curl potential by manipulating parameters such as jet speed, impingement angle, and slice opening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If real-time measurement and control of anisotropy is implemented, then manufacturing precision of curl potential is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurl potential controlVSAvoidmeasurement and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by measuring anisotropy on both surfaces of the paper sheet during manufacturing and automatically adjusting headbox operating parameters based on the measured differences, enabling closed-loop control of curl potential without requiring complex post-manufacturing laboratory analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/laboratory-based curl measurement methods with optical or electromagnetic sensing systems that can measure anisotropy non-contactly in real-time during the manufacturing process, reducing the need for physical sample handling and laboratory equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If laboratory measurement methods are used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurl measurementVSAvoidmeasurement and calibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurement of anisotropy differences during the manufacturing process itself, before the paper sheets are completed and sent to laboratories, allowing curl potential to be controlled proactively rather than measured reactively after production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediate real-time measurement system that bridges the gap between manufacturing process control and final quality verification, using sensors positioned along the paper machine to provide continuous data on anisotropy without requiring removal of samples for laboratory testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8728276B2Apparatus and method for controlling curling potential of paper, paperboard, or other product during manufacture
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8728276B2 patent drawing
  • US8728276B2 patent drawing
  • US8728276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving a measurement associated with an anisotropy of a first surface and a measurement associated with an anisotropy of a second surface of a sheet of material. The method also includes adjusting an operating parameter associated with a headbox based on the measurements. The headbox is associated with manufacture of the sheet. The operating parameter could include a jet speed, a jet impingement angle, a jet thickness, a slice opening, and/or a slice apron projection. Adjusting the operating parameter could be based on a difference between a measured anisotropy of the first surface and a measured anisotropy of the second surface. For example, the operating parameter could be adjusted to achieve a desired difference between the measured anisotropy of the first surface and the measured anisotropy of the second surface. Multiple headboxes could be controlled, such as when different headboxes are used to produce different layers of a multi-layer sheet.