Header Float Cylinder Downforce Control for Mixed Cutter Heads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines with header linkage systems face challenges in maintaining optimal operating characteristics for different types of cutter heads, such as rotary and draper style cutter heads, particularly in float operating conditions, where varying crop materials and cutter head speeds require distinct floatation responses to ensure efficient cutting without plugging or digging into the ground.

Innovation Solution

The agricultural machine incorporates a header linkage system with a float cylinder, downforce accumulator, and controllable valves to adjust fluid pressure and resistance, allowing operators to select between two float conditions based on the attached cutter head, enabling faster or slower return speeds to ground contact, thus accommodating different cutter head styles and operating conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the header linkage system is configured to exhibit a quick floatation response for rotary style cutter heads, then the cutter head can quickly move downward to maintain contact with the ground surface, but the system cannot accommodate draper style cutter heads that require slower, more controlled movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloatation response speedVSAvoidcompatibility with different cutter head styles
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The header linkage system incorporates a variable floatation response mechanism that dynamically adjusts the speed and control characteristics based on the attached cutter head type. The system transitions from a fixed configuration to a dynamic one where the floatation response can be modified in real-time to match operational requirements of different cutter heads

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (such as hydraulic flow rate, pressure, or mechanical linkage geometry) to alter the floatation response characteristics. By adjusting these parameters, the same header linkage system can provide quick response for rotary cutter heads or slow controlled movement for draper style cutter heads

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the header linkage system is configured to exhibit a slow floatation response for draper style cutter heads, then the sickle cutter-bar does not dig into the ground surface, but the system cannot accommodate rotary style cutter heads that require faster movement across the ground surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled downward movementVSAvoidcutter head movement speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The floatation response mechanism dynamically adjusts its characteristics based on the attached cutter head type, transitioning between slow controlled movement for draper style heads and faster response for rotary style heads, thereby resolving the contradiction between controlled operation and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies operational parameters to provide slow controlled downward movement when draper style cutter heads are attached, preventing the sickle cutter-bar from digging into the ground, while allowing faster movement when rotary style cutter heads are attached to maintain productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single header linkage system configuration is used for both rotary and draper style cutter heads, then device complexity is reduced, but operating characteristics cannot be optimized for different cutter head types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader linkage system configurationVSAvoidoptimal operating characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The header linkage system is designed with multi-functionality, incorporating a variable floatation response mechanism that allows a single configuration to serve multiple cutter head types effectively. This universal design eliminates the need for separate configurations while maintaining optimal operating characteristics for each cutter head style

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to adapt its operating characteristics for different cutter head types, allowing a single header linkage configuration to provide optimized performance for both rotary and draper style cutter heads by modifying hydraulic, mechanical, or control parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables the header linkage system to operate with variable downforce control, ensuring efficient cutting by adjusting return speeds according to the specific characteristics of attached cutter heads, preventing plugging or digging, and optimizing performance for both rotary and draper style cutter heads.

Implementation Method 1

A downforce accumulator is in fluid communication with the piston side fluid port of the float cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

downforce accumulator is in fluid communication with the piston side fluid port

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid accumulation: Hydraulic Accumulator

Implementation Method 3

The float cylinder includes a rod side fluid port and a piston side fluid port. The rod side fluid port is in fluid communication with the pressure source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 4

A downforce control valve is in fluid communication with the pressure source and the downforce accumulator. The downforce control valve is selectively controllable between an open position and a closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectValve flow control: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS11399464B2Windrower header floatation system having assisted downforce control
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 DEERE & CO
  • US11399464B2 patent drawing
  • US11399464B2 patent drawing
  • US11399464B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural machine includes a float cylinder interconnecting a header linkage system and a frame. A rod side accumulator is in fluid communication with a rod side fluid port of the float cylinder. A float control valve is selectively controllable between an open position allowing fluid communication between a pressure source and the rod side accumulator, and a closed position blocking fluid communication between the pressure source and the rod side accumulator. A downforce accumulator is in fluid communication with a piston side fluid port of the float cylinder. A downforce control valve is selectively controllable between an open position allowing fluid communication between the pressure source and the downforce accumulator, and a closed position blocking fluid communication between the pressure source and the downforce accumulator.