Agricultural Header Reel Control for Tine Damage Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural harvesting machines face challenges in precisely controlling the relative positions of the reel and cutter bar, particularly in complex two-dimensional movements, leading to issues like tine damage and slippage, especially when dealing with varying crop heights and ground irregularities, which existing control systems fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A control system comprising a feeder lift cylinder, reel lift actuator, reel fore and aft position actuator, cutter bar fore and aft position sensor, and a controller that automatically adjusts the reel and header positions in response to cutter bar movements, ensuring optimal alignment and preventing interference between the reel and cutter bar.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the reel is positioned close above the cutter bar to improve crop pickup, then the raking action is enhanced, but the risk of tine damage and slippage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop pickup efficiencyVSAvoidreel and cutter bar durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reel position is made dynamically adjustable through hydraulic actuators that allow the reel to move vertically and fore-aft relative to the cutter bar. This dynamic positioning enables the system to adapt to different crop conditions while maintaining optimal clearance to prevent tine damage during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors detect the relative position between the reel and cutter bar, providing feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism allows automatic adjustment of reel position to maintain safe clearance while ensuring effective crop pickup, preventing both tine damage and reduced productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the cutter bar is allowed to float or flex to adapt to ground irregularities, then the cutting action is improved, but the possibility of cutter bar rising and contacting reel tines increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter bar adaptability to ground conditionsVSAvoidcutter bar to reel tine contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutter bar is designed with flexible support that allows it to float or flex vertically in response to ground irregularities, improving adaptability to varying terrain. Simultaneously, the reel position is dynamically adjusted through hydraulic actuators to maintain optimal clearance, preventing contact between the rising cutter bar and reel tines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors monitor the relative positions of the cutter bar and reel, providing real-time feedback to the control system. This enables automatic adjustment of reel position in response to cutter bar movement, preventing harmful contact while maintaining the floating action necessary for ground adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the header width is increased to improve productivity, then more crops are harvested per pass, but the difficulty of detecting field conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting rateVSAvoidfield condition detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are positioned to detect field conditions and provide feedback to the control system. This enables automatic adjustment of header components including cutter bar position and reel position, allowing the operator to maintain optimal settings across wide header widths without manually monitoring each condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically adjusts header components in response to sensor input, enabling the system to self-regulate for optimal performance across varying field conditions. This reduces the operational burden on the operator when using wide headers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If manual adjustment of reel position is used, then the simplicity of the system is maintained, but the precision and responsiveness to rapid ground changes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidreel position precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors provide real-time feedback on reel and cutter bar positions, enabling automatic adjustment through hydraulic actuators. This feedback-controlled system achieves precise position control and rapid responsiveness to ground changes while keeping the overall control architecture relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical adjustment is replaced with an automated hydraulic actuation system controlled by sensors and a control unit. This substitution enables precise and rapid position adjustments without complex mechanical linkages, maintaining system simplicity while dramatically improving precision and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2055173B1Automatic control system for a header of an agricultural harvesting machine and method of operation of the same
Publication Date: 2017.03.15 CNH IND BELGIUM NV
  • EP2055173B1 patent drawing
  • EP2055173B1 patent drawing
  • EP2055173B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system (56, 88) for a header for an agricultural harvesting machine such as a combine (20), providing features including an automatic reel position control operable to provide at least one selectable predetermined position combination of a cutter bar (30) and reel (34), and which can also automatically control height and/or fore and aft positions of the reel responsive to cutter bar movements, as required, for purposes such as for maintaining and/or optimizing the reel / cutter bar relationship for a particular crop and/or condition, and for avoiding interference between the tines or fingers of the reel and the sickle of the cutter bar, and possible damage to the tines and/or sickles, and slippage of the reel and/or sickle drive, that can result.