Header Separable Tractor Mounting Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crop harvesting machines face challenges in efficiently disconnecting and reconnecting the header from the tractor during transport and operation, particularly in accommodating the header's up-and-down and twisting movements, which complicates the management of hydraulic hoses and affects operational efficiency and safety.

Innovation Solution

A crop harvesting machine design featuring a mounting assembly that allows the header to move upwardly, downwardly, and twist relative to the tractor, with a flexible conduit assembly and support member that includes articulation components and releasable couplings to manage hydraulic hoses, enabling easy disconnection and reconnection while preventing hose collapse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the header is made separable from the tractor for easy transport and storage, then the ease of operation is improved, but the complexity of the mounting and disconnection mechanism increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of header disconnectionVSAvoidcomplexity of mounting assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting assembly is divided into separable components including quick-release couplings that allow the header to be disconnected from the tractor in a simple operation, while each component remains relatively simple in design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting assembly incorporates dynamic elements such as articulation components that allow movement accommodation without requiring complex rigid connection mechanisms, enabling easy separation while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the header is allowed to move upwardly and downwardly to accommodate ground contours, then the adaptability is improved, but the stability of hydraulic fluid supply deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader movement adaptabilityVSAvoidhydraulic fluid supply stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible hydraulic conduits that can bend and flex to accommodate the header's upward and downward movements while maintaining continuous hydraulic fluid flow, eliminating the need for rigid piping that would restrict movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible conduit assembly acts as an intermediary between the fixed tractor hydraulic system and the moving header, absorbing the movement variations and ensuring stable fluid supply to the hydraulic drive system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the header is permitted to twist relative to the tractor for better crop engagement, then the adaptability is improved, but the reliability of conduit connection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader twisting adaptabilityVSAvoidconduit connection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible conduit assembly can accommodate twisting movements of the header relative to the tractor while maintaining secure connections, allowing the header to rotate and twist for optimal crop engagement without compromising hydraulic supply reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The articulation components provide dynamic adjustment capabilities that allow the header to twist and orient itself for better crop engagement while the flexible conduits dynamically adjust to maintain reliable connections throughout the range of motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the conduit assembly is made flexible to accommodate header movements, then the adaptability is improved, but the risk of hose collapse increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconduit flexibilityVSAvoidhose collapse prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible conduit assembly uses specially designed flexible hoses that maintain structural integrity and prevent collapse while allowing the necessary flexibility to accommodate header movements, combining adaptability with reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The conduit support member provides counterbalancing support to the flexible conduit assembly, preventing hose collapse under the weight and pressure of the hydraulic fluid while allowing the conduit to remain flexible for movement accommodation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances operational efficiency by simplifying the disconnection and reconnection process, reducing manual labor, and ensuring secure hose management, allowing for bi-directional tractor movement and efficient transport of the header, while maintaining effective hydraulic fluid supply to the header system.

Implementation Method 1

an engine and hydraulic pump mounted on the tractor for providing a pressurized fluid output; a flexible conduit assembly having one or more conduits having an extent from the tractor to the header for connecting the pressurized fluid from the tractor to the hydraulic header drive system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

the conduit support member including articulation components providing articulation of said one end relative to the other end so as to accommodate said movements of the header relative to the tractor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectArticulation: Hinge

Implementation Method 3

the conduit support member including support components providing support to the conduit assembly to prevent collapse thereof when said other end is disconnected from said other of the tractor and the header

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStructural support: Arch

Data Source

PatentEP3146832B1Crop harvesting machine with a header separable from a tractor
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 MACDON INDS
  • EP3146832B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3146832B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3146832B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a swather a support (16) arm (70) is attached to the header (23) to carry the heavy hydraulic hoses (25C) which are connected to the tractor for supplying the drive fluid to the hydraulic system (25E) of the header (23). The support (16) arm (70) is articulated so as to accommodate the up-and-down and twisting movement of the header (23) relative to the tractor (10) during harvesting action and this supported to prevent collapse when the hoses (25C) are disconnected from the tractor (10) manifold (25D). The support (16) arm (70) is attached at the wheel strut (16) by a releasable ball joint coupling (81). From the coupling (81) at the wheel strut (16), there is a free portion of the hydraulic hoses (25C) which extends to the manifold (25D) at the tractor (10) where the ends of the hoses (25C) are attached to manually graspable handle portions which can be lifted away and the attached to a bracket (81A, 81, 92, 98) on the support (16) arm (70).