Headerless Catalyst Cooler Design for FCC Heat Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing FCC processes face challenges in managing excess heat generated during catalyst regeneration due to heavier hydrocarbon feeds, leading to equipment damage and reduced yields, particularly with internal heat exchangers being difficult to retrofit and service.

Innovation Solution

An external catalyst cooling vessel with a headerless design featuring a central supply tube surrounded by a coaxial heat removal conduit and multiple external heat removal tubes, arranged in a triangular pattern, enhances heat transfer and reduces channeling, allowing for improved catalyst distribution and uniform contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If internal heat exchangers are used for catalyst cooling, then heat transfer efficiency is improved, but device complexity and difficulty of retrofitting and servicing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger is extracted from the internal regenerator structure and placed in an external catalyst cooler vessel. This allows the heat transfer function to be maintained while eliminating the complexity of integrating tubes within the regenerator structure, enabling easier retrofitting and servicing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat exchanger system is segmented into separate external components: the catalyst cooler vessel, cooling coils, and associated piping are independent modules that can be installed and serviced separately from the regenerator, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If conventional external heat exchangers with headers are used, then heat transfer area is increased, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat transfer areaVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header and heat removal tubes are merged into an integrated heat removal unit where the tubes are directly connected to the heat removal conduit without separate header components. This maintains the heat transfer area while reducing the number of parts and assembly complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The heat removal conduit serves multiple functions: it acts as both the coolant distribution manifold and the structural support for the heat removal tubes, eliminating the need for separate header components and reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If heavier hydrocarbon feeds are used, then productivity is improved, but excess heat generation damages equipment and reduces yields

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidexcess heat
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The external catalyst cooler vessel acts as an intermediary between the regenerator and the reactor, providing a dedicated heat removal system that controls catalyst temperature before it enters the reactor, preventing excess heat from damaging equipment or reducing yields.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Catalyst cooling is performed in advance in the external cooler vessel before the catalyst enters the reactor. This preliminary temperature control prevents the catalyst from introducing excess heat into the reaction system, allowing heavier feeds to be processed safely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a 25-30% reduction in vessel diameter or a 50-100% increase in duty capacity with fewer parts, lower manufacturing costs, and improved thermal control, ensuring uniform heat transfer and reduced shell side bypass.

Implementation Method 1

indirect contact heat exchange is achieved using cooling coils or tubes, through which a cooling fluid is passed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

Heat exchangers utilizing cooling coils or tubes running through a fluidized catalyst particle bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

a substantially vertical, cylindrical and close ended heat removal vessel and through the shell side fluid solid particles flow downwardly in the form of dense phase fluidized bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 4

Heat exchangers utilizing cooling coils or tubes running through a fluidized catalyst particle bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3648880B1Catalyst heat removal cluster and tube design
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 T EN PROCESS TECHNOLOGY INC
  • EP3648880B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3648880B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3648880B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

An external catalyst cooler arrangement for an FCC regenerator improves the operation of the catalyst cooler by the use of a heat removal unit design utilizing a central supply tube and central heat removal conduit surrounded by external heat removal tubes connected directly to the central heat removal conduit.