Headlamp Locking Mechanism State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional portable illumination systems, such as headlamps, have limited unlocking mechanisms, which restrict flexibility and increase the risk of unintended battery use when stored.

Innovation Solution

A portable illumination system with a user interface that includes multiple physical user inputs, such as short and long pushes on buttons, allowing for various combinations to unlock and re-activate the headlamp, and featuring modes like reactive lighting, constant lighting, and red lighting, with a processor controlling state changes to minimize unintentional use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single-path unlocking mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability and user control flexibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking mechanism flexibilityVSAvoidswitching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unlocking mechanism is segmented into multiple independent input paths: a first input path for unlocking from deactivated state, and a second input path for unlocking from locked state. Each path has its own switching elements and control logic, allowing flexible unlocking options without requiring a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The switching mechanism is designed to handle multiple functions through a unified architecture: it can detect different input patterns (single press, double press, long press), manage different unlocking paths, control various operational modes (reactive lighting, constant lighting, red lighting), and transition between states (deactivated, locked, operational). This multi-functional design provides adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple input paths and combinations are provided for unlocking, then the adaptability and user control are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking mechanism flexibilityVSAvoidswitching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit dynamically processes input signals by detecting patterns (single press, double press, long press duration) and transitioning between states (deactivated, locked, operational) based on the current state and input received. This dynamic response allows multiple unlocking combinations to be handled by a single adaptable control logic rather than separate mechanical mechanisms for each combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that receives various input patterns from switching elements, processes them through state machine logic, and produces appropriate state transitions. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of multiple input paths, allowing flexible unlocking options while maintaining manageable system complexity through centralized intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a simple locking mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability in preventing unintended battery use is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery preservationVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively prevents unintended battery discharge by implementing a locked state that blocks all operational inputs during storage. The locking mechanism is designed to be engaged by default or through simple user action, and requires deliberate unlocking sequences to activate, thereby preemptively preventing accidental power consumption before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking function is prepared in advance and can be automatically engaged when the device is placed in storage mode. The system anticipates storage conditions and pre-configures the locked state, requiring specific unlocking patterns before allowing power consumption, thus ensuring battery preservation without requiring complex real-time monitoring during storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3187772B1Portable lamp comprising an improved locking mechanism
Publication Date: 2023.02.01 ZEDEL CORP
  • EP3187772B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3187772B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3187772B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A headlamp comprising: at least one light source; an electrical power source, a first state corresponding to at least one activated state in which the electrical power source is coupled to the at least one light source to generate a light beam; a second state corresponding to a deactivated state wherein the electrical power source is not coupled to the at least one light source and no light beam is generated; a third state corresponding to a locked state in which the electrical power source is not coupled to the at least one light source and no light beam is generated; a switching mechanism configured to receive at least a first and a second physical user input through at least one switching element; a processor coupled to the switching mechanism and being configured to select one among said first, second and third states in response to said physical user inputs; wherein the processor is configured to correlate at least one alternative of two different physical user inputs for controlling a state change between said third state and said first state.