Headland Turn Path Planning to Reduce Soil Compaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional end-of-row turns for work vehicles in agricultural fields often result in soil compaction in untracked headland regions, reducing crop yield due to the vehicle's weight and path traversal.

Innovation Solution

A control system that determines and implements an end-of-row turn path for work vehicles to minimize travel along untracked headland portions by following previously tracked paths, considering factors like minimum turning radius, previous turn paths, and agricultural implement activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the work vehicle follows traditional end-of-row turn paths through untracked headland regions, then the vehicle can complete row transitions, but soil compaction occurs reducing crop yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow transition capabilityVSAvoidsoil compaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes field data to identify previously tracked headland regions before the vehicle arrives. By analyzing historical tracking data in advance, the system determines optimal turn paths that follow existing tracked areas, preventing soil compaction before the vehicle completes its turn maneuver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the vehicle's position, orientation, and speed while comparing real-time location against the planned end-of-row turn path. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustments to steering and speed controls, ensuring the vehicle stays on approved paths that avoid untracked headland regions and prevents soil compaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the control system generates optimized end-of-row turn paths, then soil compaction is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoil compactionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a unified platform: it processes GPS location data, analyzes historical tracking information, generates optimized turn paths, and controls vehicle steering and speed. This multi-functional integration reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's own historical tracking data and current position information to generate its own optimized turn paths. By leveraging existing vehicle data and onboard processing capabilities, the system avoids needing external infrastructure or additional specialized equipment, reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the vehicle travels along untracked headland portions, then row transitions are completed, but agricultural product growth is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow transition efficiencyVSAvoidcrop yield reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies approved end-of-row turn paths by analyzing historical tracking data before the vehicle reaches the headland region. This advance planning ensures the vehicle will follow only those paths that have been previously tracked and approved, preventing crop yield reduction while maintaining efficient row transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the vehicle's position during the turn and compares it against the pre-approved path. This real-time feedback ensures the vehicle stays on tracks that have been verified as safe for crop growth, preventing deviation into untracked areas that would harm agricultural product growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11224154B2Headland turn planning for a work vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.01.18 INC BLUE LEAF I
  • US11224154B2 patent drawing
  • US11224154B2 patent drawing
  • US11224154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work vehicle guidance system includes a control system that has a controller having a processor and a memory. The control system is configured to determine a relative location of a work vehicle to a work area. Moreover, the control system is configured to determine an end-of-row turn path for the work vehicle based at least on the relative location of the work vehicle and a minimum turning radius of the work vehicle. The end-of-row turn path is configured to direct the work vehicle to turn from a first main swath of the work area to a headland swath of the work area, travel along the headland swath in direction toward a second main swath of the work area, and turn from the headland swath to the second main swath. Further, the control system is configured to output a guidance signal comprising guidance instructions to implement the end-of-row turn path.