Vehicle Headlight Modulator Using Radar and Light Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle headlights can be a significant distraction to other drivers at night due to the difficulty in determining the proximity and movement of approaching vehicles, and existing solutions for automating light regulation face challenges in accurately detecting objects and adjusting light output.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a combination of light sensors and radar devices to detect the proximity and movement of objects, with a processor controlling light modulators to adjust the intensity of vehicle lights based on detected conditions, such as the presence of a moving vehicle and ambient light levels, to prevent glare.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If vehicle headlights are kept at high intensity to improve visibility, then the driver's own visibility is improved, but other drivers are distracted and their vision is impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadlight visibilityVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the headlight intensity adjustable and responsive to changing conditions. The system dynamically switches between high beam and low beam modes based on the detection of approaching vehicles, allowing the illumination intensity to adapt to the environmental context rather than remaining static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback through light sensors that detect the presence and position of approaching vehicles. This sensory feedback is processed by a controller that automatically adjusts the headlight intensity in response to the detected conditions, creating a closed-loop control system that balances visibility needs with glare prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If automated light regulation is implemented to reduce distraction, then driver safety is improved, but the system complexity increases due to difficulty in detecting objects and determining their proximity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into an integrated system that combines light sensors, radar devices, processors, and light modulators working together. This consolidation approach manages complexity by creating a unified automated light regulation system rather than separate independent components, improving reliability through coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional components that perform multiple tasks. For example, the light sensors not only detect approaching vehicles but also provide information about their position and movement. The radar device serves both detection and proximity determination functions, reducing the need for separate specialized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Extent of automation

If light sensors are used to detect approaching vehicles, then automated regulation is improved, but the accuracy in determining object type, location, and proximity is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight regulation automationVSAvoidobject detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces radar devices as intermediary components between the light sensors and the control system. The radar provides additional measurement data about approaching objects, serving as a mediator that enhances the accuracy of object detection, classification, and proximity determination beyond what light sensors alone can achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system uses a composite approach by combining multiple types of sensors (light sensors and radar devices) to create a more accurate and reliable detection capability. This multi-sensor fusion approach leverages the strengths of each sensor type to overcome the limitations of individual sensors, improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces driver distraction by automatically adjusting light output to minimize glare from approaching vehicles, enhancing safety by accurately detecting and responding to the proximity and movement of other vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

A light sensor may be used to detect the presence of incoming light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

A radar device may also be used to detect the proximity of an object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar detection: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS8384289B2Method and system for a light sensing headlight modulator
Publication Date: 2013.02.26 THOMAS KEITH
  • US8384289B2 patent drawing
  • US8384289B2 patent drawing
  • US8384289B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for providing a method and system for light sensing vehicle light modulator are disclosed. In one particular exemplary embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method, comprising detecting incoming light utilizing a plurality of light sensors operatively connected to an vehicle, measuring the incoming light intensity, and decreasing a intensity of light output by one or more lights of the vehicle based at least in pan on a measurement of the incoming light intensity.