Headphone Cover Core Stability and Fabric Durability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing headphone covers face issues with fabric degradation due to friction and easy displacement or detachment from the headphone, as they need to allow sound passage and cannot be thick enough to maintain stability.

Innovation Solution

A headphone cover with a foldable fabric and a core around the sound passage opening, where the core has a compressive yield stress of 0.0587 MPa or more to prevent displacement and detachment, and flat rubber on the other side to resist friction and maintain stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the headphone cover is formed of thin fabric to allow sound passage, then sound transmission is improved, but the fabric is easily torn due to friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound transmissionVSAvoidfabric durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The headphone cover uses different materials for different regions: thin fabric in the sound passage area for sound transmission, and flat rubber at the opening for friction resistance and durability. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between sound transmission and fabric durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the headphone cover is formed of thick fabric to prevent tearing, then fabric durability is improved, but sound passage is blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric durabilityVSAvoidsound transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The thin fabric is used specifically in the sound passage region where sound transmission is critical, while thick flat rubber is used at the opening where mechanical durability is critical. This spatial differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If a sound passage opening is formed in the central portion of the headphone cover, then sound transmission is improved, but the headphone cover is easily displaced or detached

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound transmissionVSAvoidheadphone cover stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The headphone cover combines fabric and flat rubber in a composite structure. The flat rubber component provides the stability and friction resistance needed to prevent displacement, while the fabric portion with opening allows sound passage. This composite approach resolves the contradiction between sound transmission and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Stability of the object's composition

If the core has high compressive yield stress to prevent displacement, then headphone cover stability is improved, but the core becomes difficult to deform for mounting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheadphone cover stabilityVSAvoidmounting ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The core's mechanical properties are precisely controlled with compressive yield stress of 0.0587 MPa or more, which is sufficiently high to prevent displacement during use but low enough to allow deformation during mounting. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction between stability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures the headphone cover remains stably mounted on the ear pad without blocking sound, with the core's deformability allowing easy mounting and the flat rubber preventing fabric tears, thus maintaining fabric coverage and preventing detachment.

Implementation Method 1

A compressive yield force in an extending direction of the core is equal to or greater than 0.0587 Mpa. The core is deformed when bending stress in a direction perpendicular to the extending direction is equal to or smaller than 0.057 Mpa.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the flat rubber prevents the other side of the fabric from being torn, due to its resistance to friction and keeps the headphone cover stably mounted on the headphone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11792558B2Headphone cover
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 YOKOTA SHUJI
  • US11792558B2 patent drawing
  • US11792558B2 patent drawing
  • US11792558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

[Problem] To provide a headphone cover that does not block a sound from a headphone and is able to keep its fabric stably covering the headphone.[Solving Means] A headphone cover 1 includes fabric 14 that has an opening in a position corresponding to the sound passage position on one side of an ear pad and is foldable at least from the one side toward another side of the ear pad by 90° and a core 16 disposed around the opening. The compressive yield force in the extending direction of the core 16 is equal to or greater than 0.0587 Mpa.