Headphone Wind Noise Detection and Occlusion Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Headphones muffle external sounds and suffer from an occlusion effect, where internal sounds are over-emphasized, and wind noise is amplified, especially in low frequencies, due to passive attenuation and bone conduction, affecting the user's experience.

Innovation Solution

An audio processing system with a digital audio processor in the headphone housing that uses an external microphone and an accelerometer to detect wind noise, applying a feedforward filter to reduce low-frequency gain relative to high frequencies and a feedback filter to mitigate the occlusion effect, combining signals to produce sound with transparency and reduced wind noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If headphones use passive attenuation to block external sounds, then noise isolation is improved, but wind noise in low frequencies is amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal noise isolationVSAvoidwind noise amplification
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a feedback loop where the external microphone captures wind noise, the audio processor analyzes it, and adjusts the feedforward filter coefficients in real-time to cancel out the amplified wind noise while preserving the noise isolation benefit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the parameters of the feedforward filter based on detected wind conditions. When wind noise is detected, the filter coefficients are adjusted to reduce low-frequency gain, thereby preventing wind noise amplification while maintaining passive attenuation for other frequencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If headphones block the aural canal for noise isolation, then external sound blocking is improved, but the occlusion effect is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexternal sound blockingVSAvoidocclusion effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary feedback path using the internal microphone and audio processor. This intermediary captures bone conduction sounds and external sounds separately, processes them, and reconstructs the audio output to cancel the occlusion effect while maintaining noise isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the purely mechanical passive attenuation approach with an electronic audio processing system that uses microphones, processors, and filters to achieve noise isolation without the harmful occlusion effect. The electronic system can selectively cancel unwanted frequencies while preserving desired sounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If transparency effect is enabled to allow external sounds, then environmental awareness is improved, but wind noise is amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental sound transmissionVSAvoidwind noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality treatments to different frequency components of external sounds. The feedforward filter selectively allows high-frequency environmental sounds to pass through while attenuating low-frequency wind noise, achieving local quality optimization in the frequency domain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces wind noise and occlusion effects, allowing for faithful reproduction of external sounds without amplifying low-frequency wind noise, enhancing the user's awareness of the surroundings while minimizing internal sound distortion.

Implementation Method 1

an accelerometer within the headphone housing to receive vibration through bone conduction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBone conduction:

Implementation Method 2

analyze signals from the internal microphone, the external microphone and the accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrophone transduction:

Data Source

PatentUS10657950B2Headphone transparency, occlusion effect mitigation and wind noise detection
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 APPLE INC
  • US10657950B2 patent drawing
  • US10657950B2 patent drawing
  • US10657950B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A headphone has a driver, an internal microphone, an accelerometer, and an external microphone. An audio processor analyzes signals to detect wind noise. Gain of lower frequencies is reduced relative to higher frequencies, in a first filter that is operating on an audio signal from the external microphone in a feedforward path, responsive to detecting increased wind noise. A second filter in an audio signal feedback path may be adjusted to compensate for the gain change in the first filter that may mitigate occlusion effect. Outputs of the feedforward path in the feedback path are combined to produce an audio signal for the driver. The driver produces sound in the aural canal that has transparency with reduced wind noise, relative to sound external to the headphone. Other aspects are also described and claimed.